For those interested, I've just tracked down a website for the group who ran
the deliberative poll -
http://www.i-d-a.com.au/presentations.htm
Gives quite a bit of info and might be a good starting point for people
trying to judge it as a process. One thing it indicates is that WA's were
included, Ian. I also agree with you when you say: "It (the poll)
certainly does not indicate public sentiment, only what could possibly have
been."
Tim
==========================
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, October 29, 1999 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: SMH - 'Yes' case on its last legs, say
strategists
>I have wondered if any Western Australians were included in the
>'deliberative poll'. In a State where daylight saving has been rejected on
>the basis of it 'fading the curtains' surely even an intense education
>programme similar to the deliberative poll would fail. Yet we in the West
>will play a vital role in determining whether we become a republic or not.
>Dont forget my vote as a resident of W.A. is worth four times that of a
>similar person in N.S.W.
>
>Under normal circumstances the 'deliberative poll' as a methodological tool
>is admirable. Everything else being equal, it shows that a cool
articulation
>of circumstance and predictions would, in this case, and if a similar
>exercise was carried out, result in a 'Yes' vote. Similarly, if the same
>exercise had been carried out in regard to the GST that tax system would
>have been blown out of the water. The whole methodology is based upon that
>well worn adage of democracy: making an informed decision. Unfortunately,
>politicians see this adage as an inhibiter to progress and Howard has
>brought the antonym to this adage to an art form.
>
>Also unfortunately, this 'poll' has occurred far to late to implement its
>findings and it is to the everlasting disgrace of the 'No voters in
>including the P.M.' that such an education campaign cannot be waged. It
>certainly does not indicate public sentiment, only what could possibly have
>been.
>
>Howard is a consummate politician. He can read the electorate better than
>most and in both the republic issue and the GST he correctly perceived that
>if the electorate had the information he would lose. So, by the use of
undue
>haste and confusion he effectively neutralised arguments against his bogus
>claims. We now see why the GST was brought in, not as the Democrats were
>hoodwinked into believing, but to subsidise the insatiable needs of
business
>for less responsibility for tax.
>
>Back in the fifties I was designing a supermarket for Foodland. This was at
>the time a new concept so much research was needed by myself. One of the
>statements made to me stayed impeccably in my mind: 'The concept of a
>supermarket is based on one axiom, a person can only remember the price of
>five to six items, so this enables the introduction of price confusion,
>prices are changed randomly. The customers never are allowed to establish a
>set price for any item. Is there a correct price? When these sort of
>discussions come up I always ask the question: "Who knows the correct price
>for petrol per litre?"
>
>The concepts I heard articulated in the fifties in relation to supermarkets
>are alive and well. One can see them in use all over. Particularly, they
>have been utilised to good effect by politicians of all persuasions.
>
>________________________________________________
>Ian Henderson Murdoch University
>24 Harfleur Place Murdoch 6150
>Hamilton Hill Tel: 61 8 94183972
>Western Australia 6163 Fax:61 8 93606575
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>'Freedom is having nothing left to fear.'
>_________________________________________________
>
>Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: SMH - 'Yes' case on its last legs, say
>strategists
>
>
>> Tim,
>> Your position is entrenched and so are many others. I just want to
mention
>that Anthony Green called the
>> 'deliberative poll' a social experiment and not a poll.
>> A lot of people would disagree with you also about the 'poll' being
>properly representative.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
>To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
body
>of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
>copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
>use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed
further without
>permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
>RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission
from the
copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/