tdunlop wrote:
> >No, I'm afraid not.
>
> Ah, well. I guess we can have all the arguments again at the next
> referendum - if I'm not too arthritic to type by then ;-)
Well, it's not stopping me, so you have nothing to worry about. ;-)
> >Did you happen to see Lateline either last night or today? It was a very
> good discussion and brought up many
> >points as to why even though 91% (in the latest poll) expressed a wish for
> a republic, this model isn't
> >likely to make it tomorrow.
>
> Yes I did see it. I'm afraid I find Leonie Kramer unbearable and thought
> most of what she said was self-serving garbage.
Well, we agree on that at least...;-) I was impressed with David Mallouf's
contributions.
> Still, that's just me being
> unfair probably. I take your wider point, though. It seems it will go
> down, though I haven't given up hope entirely. Maybe enough of all those
> republicans out there will find it just too hard to vote for the Queen once
> they're in the booth? We'll see I guess....
If that was the problem then the result would be different. Most are not voting 'for'
the Queen but against
the model...
Trudy
-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission
from the
copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
