THE AGE
Maralinga's clean-up under cloud

By PAUL HEINRICHS 
Sunday 16 April 2000 

A breakdown of Maralinga's safety procedure allowed a man working on the
nuclear
clean-up site to fly to Melbourne wearing a plutonium-contaminated
shirt.

The plutonium was discovered accidentally when the man was given a final
routine
lung test in Melbourne.

The incident, which took place in February, 1998, was not reported to
the airline and
radiation control procedures at Maralinga were not reviewed or changed
as a result of
it. The revelation of the breach came as the Federal Government prepared
to hand the
former British A-bomb test site back to its traditional owners, the
Maralinga Tjarutja
Aborigines, after a $108million clean-up.

On March 1, the Resources Minister, Senator Nick Minchin, declared the
project
completed on time and within budget.

It meant Aboriginal owners could travel and hunt across the area and
reside on all but
120 square kilometres of land at Taranaki, which remained lightly
contaminated.

But the ABC's Radio National current affairs program, Background
Briefing, today
raises questions about whether safety had been compromised.

Researcher Gregg Borschmann cited documentary evidence and used
interview
material to show that key insiders, including some of the Government's
advisers,
believed the job had not been finished properly.

Engineer Alan Parkinson, a former government adviser on Maralinga and
now the
Tjarutja's adviser, was critical of the standards used in the clean-up
and compared
them unfavorably with those used in the United States' Nevada
nuclear-testing site. 

He challenged whether the 1992 code of practice, used by the Government
as a
yardstick to allow the burial of the plutonium-contaminated waste, was
written with
Maralinga plutonium in mind. The ABC program said this concern was
shared by
other scientists who believed the code they wrote would be applied to
industrial, and
possibly medical, radioactive material with a shorter half-life than
plutonium 239,
which is 24,000 years.

The program looked at the decision to abandon the technique of "in situ
vitrification",
known as ISV - which uses high temperatures to stabilise contaminated
soil in glass
blocks - to dispose of several kilograms of heavily contaminated debris
buried in 21
pits at Taranaki.

These were the legacy of the so-called Vixen-B atomic trials in the
early 1960s
involving nuclear weapons placed on stands a few metres above ground and
detonated
by conventional means.

Although $30million was spent pioneering the ISV technique, the process
was stopped
last year and the remaining hazardous material buried in another pit. 

The program quoted official notes leaked from a meeting of the Maralinga
Rehabilitation Technical Advisory Committee last August in which a
member, Dr
Mike Costello, an international authority on plutonium, said he did not
believe "this
shallow burial is the best we could do as it could be encapsulated in
concrete".

The program showed that by October 1998, there was conflict between the
firm in
charge of the ISV, Geosafe Australia, and Gutteridge Haskins Davey, the
major
engineering firm that assumed project management at Maralinga when it
acquired a
Commonwealth company that previously had the job.

Background Briefing can be heard on ABC Radio National at 9.10am today.
It will be
repeated on Tuesday at 7.10pm.


-- 
_________________________________
Truth is a pathless land. --- Krishnamurti
-------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to