The Advertiser
Dreamtime push for Maralinga An [sic] insult to the culture,
  says Aboriginal leader
  By Chief Political Reporter PHILLIP COOREY in Canberra 
  03may00

  THE nuclear contamination of a vast tract of Maralinga land should be
incorporated
  into Aboriginal Dreamtime so future indigenous generations never
settled there, a
  scientist in charge of the clean-up suggested yesterday.

  Dr Geoff Williams, from the Australian Radiation Protection and
Nuclear Safety
  Agency's environmental and radiation health branch, told a Senate
estimates
  committee the poisoned 120sq km Taranaki test site would be
uninhabitable for
  24,000 years.

  Signposts placed in a 450sq km radius warning of the restricted area
would not
  last forever, making Federal Government record-keeping of the zone
"vitally
  important".

  "But, hopefully, the Aborigines themselves � they have a very good way
of
  keeping records � they have records going back beyond our sort of
memory," Dr
  Williams said.

  Asked by Democrats Senator Lyn Allison if he meant Dreamtime stories ,
Dr
  Williams said "absolutely".

  "They have their own way of recording things and one would hope with
our
  guidance that would become part of their tradition," he said.

  However, his comments were branded "an insult to the culture" by
  Maralinga-Tjarutja elder Archie Barton.

  "It's an issue that's been created by white man. How the hell do you
get that in a
  Dreamtime story?" he said.

  Mr Barton said the location of the poisoned site would be passed down
from
  generation to generation.

  But that was not the same as Dreamtime which, in Aboriginal mythology,
was the
  time in which Earth received its present form and in which the
patterns, nature
  and cycles of life were begun.

  Taranaki is also the site of most of the controversial trenches from
the recent
  clean-up. Exhumed radioactive material left behind by the British was
buried under
  clean soil instead of being melted into blocks in the original pits in
which it had
  been dumped.

  The melting process was abandoned following an explosion a year ago.

  Despite claims the pits were safe, the safety agency's chief
executive, Dr John
  Loy, said they would have to be inspected up to four times a year to
ensure they
  were not interfered with and deadly plutonium released in the dust.

  Dr Loy said the inspection duties would either fall on the local
people, the South
  Australian Government or the Commonwealth. The safety agency would
issue
  rules soon on the inspection process but Dr Loy said it would be
ludicrous to try
  and enforce a law for 24,000 years.

  "I think it's only realistic you can only throw out that as a rule for
. . . 100 years
  or 200 years," he said.

  "And then what happens after that, I guess, is for future generations
to decide."

  Now the clean-up was "complete", Dr Loy said the agency would consult
  Aborigines on what "their lifestyle might be in occupying the land"
and estimate
  precisely the amount of radiation they would be exposed to.

  During the recently completed $108 million Maralinga clean-up, it was
agreed
  remediating the Taranaki site would be too costly and create further
environmental
  damage.

  The Maralinga-Tjarutja people would be allowed only to pass through
the land but
  should not camp there.

  They were compensated $13.5 million for the loss of its full use and
would be able
  to pursue a traditional lifestyle on the remaining 90 per cent of the
Maralinga land.


-- 
_________________________________
Truth is a pathless land. --- Krishnamurti
-------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to