RBA clarifies GST influence on
 policy

 Source: AAP | Published: Friday May 5, 12:05 PM 

 The Reserve Bank of Australia's Semi-Annual
 Statement on Monetary Policy today was a more
 complete explanation of the central bank's views on
 monetary policy than the statement announcing the
 interest rate hike two days earlier. 

 This was not just a matter of size - today's
 Statement was 49 pages, including charts, while
 Wednesday's effort barely covered both sides of an
 A4 sheet. 

 What Wednesday's announcement - and its
 predecessor - lacked was an acknowledgment that
 the tax package had bearing on the Bank's policy
 stance and an explanation of just why the RBA is so
 concerned about the exchange rate that it was
 nominated as a trigger for both of the latest two rate
 hikes. 

 Today's Statement was therefore more balanced. 

 In terms of the net impact of the tax package on
 economic activity, the bank appears fairly relaxed. 

 While the package will give the economy a direct
 fiscal boost, the bank has also been mulling over the
 impact on spending patterns of shifts in relative
 prices. Its conclusion is that "the overall package, in
 net terms, will shift demand from the second half of
 the year (calendar 2000)into the first half", and not
 the other way around. 

 One of the Bank's two main concerns regarding the
 inflation outlook is the labour market. 

 The Bank is acutely conscious of the relatively low
 unemployment rate, and notes survey evidence (the
 NAB and ACCI Westpac business surveys) that
 skills shortages have recently begun to emerge. 

 "In these circumstances, some upward pressure on
 wages growth might be expected in the period
 ahead." 

 But the bank clearly believes the risk is enhanced by
 the impending GST: "The risk of a significant
 acceleration in wages could be heightened by
 increased inflation expectations, and by the high
 headline inflation figures that will be associated with
 the implementation of tax reform," the Bank said. 

 The Bank is concerned that enterprise bargains
 containing clauses triggering higher wage rates in the
 event of unexpectedly high inflation "may become
 more prevalent in the months ahead". 

 Even if this does not happen, the concern remains
 that "high CPI outcomes might trigger a more
 general increase in ongoing price and wage
 expectations." 

 The Bank is clearly reluctant to put a figure on just
 how high the headline inflation rate might go. 

 However it seems to be nervous about the prospect
 of inflation over 6 per cent. 

 It falls back on "the Government's published
 modelling of the tax package" which suggest the
 GST will add 2.75 per cent to the inflation rate
 though 2000/01, but admits that the initial impact of
 the tax shake-up "could be expected to be somewhat
 larger". 

 Inflation is currently at 2.8 per cent, so it would not
 take much, obviously, to push inflation to 6.5 per
 cent or even higher, but this conclusion is left to the
 reader. 

 It is also left to the reader to conclude that this risk,
 and the consequent risk of higher wage demands,
 has added to the pressure to raise interest rates.
 Monetary policy is all about risk management, after
 all. 

 The RBA has covered itself politically by repeating
 the usual mantra that it will turn a blind eye to the
 initial impact of the GST but that it will "remain
 vigilant against second round wage and price
 increases that might lead to an escalation in ongoing
 inflation". 

 Even so, the chance of those second-round
 influences getting off the ground will be enhanced
 by a tight labour market and other pressures on
 inflation as the GST is introduced. 

 So -- although the RBA would be loath to admit it --
 there is a case for saying that tightening of monetary
 policy we have seen so far is at least partly a
 pre-emptive strike against those second-round
 effects. 

 The other main concern of the RBA at the moment
 is the exchange rate. 

 Although the Bank is uncertain about how quickly,
 and to what extent, the lower exchange rate might
 push prices up at the retail level, it sees the risk as
 greater than it was in 1997 and 1998. 

 The main differences this time, according to the
 Statement, are stronger domestic demand, higher
 capacity utilisation strong global economic growth,
 reducing competitive pressures both domestically
 and internationally. 

 The Statement notes that the "pass-through"
 depends also on how long the Australia dollar stays
 as low as it is, and suggests, perhaps hopefully, that
 "this weakness may not persist". 

 But it warns: "Added pressure on prices from this
 source, at a time when domestic pressure may be
 intensifying, would clearly be unhelpful." 

 Given that "domestic pressure" includes the sticker
 shock effect of the GST, it is also reasonable to say
 the looming GST has made the RBA more prone to
 try to add some starch to the Aussie by lifting the
 overnight cash rate. 

 � This material is subject to copyright and any
 unauthorised use, copying or mirroring is prohibited. 

-- 
_________________________________
Truth is a pathless land. --- Krishnamurti
-------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to