You mean we should set up a filter for ShareObject so this shareobject is
limited accessed only by appointed users?  So a private pipeline between
these users may be established, right? If we confirm these ideas, Some
problem I will ask:

1: when one person named Edmond want IM with the other person named Ryan
online, and then Edmond established a filter ShareObject with unique name,
right? But how can Edmond dynamic builder a message listener for the new
ShareObject, and how can Ryan know the filter ShareObject was established
and know Edmond want private IM with him? So Ryan can connect the filter
ShareObject and listener new message;

2:how can we know the ShareObject in server is no longer use, so we must
remove it, Manager all ShareObject is the most important way to make our App
more reliable and scalable

3:if we do a filter ShareObject, this way may cause more and more
ShareObject established after the App runs for a period time ,right? This
way may cost too large CPU/MEMORY demanding , how can we avoid this to the
best of our abilities



-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 代表
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2006年5月25日 17:12

Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:20:45 +0800
From: "Steven Gong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Red5] about Instand Messanging base on red5 server
To: Red5@osflash.org
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"

Hi Wenhua,

On 5/25/06, ?????? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all??
>   Now I know the way share object to notify all client user online,and all
> user can receive the message anyone send, but a question bother me a long
> time about how can I send a message go through red5 sever to one person
> online , and we establish new shareobject for these two person? I do not
> think so, but how can I do? Can anyone tell me the way to solve my
> problem?
> Maybe sample code for me is better! Thks all


You request is sensible. One thing I am thinking about for a long time is
that if the new messaging structure can fit well with streaming, why not
extend it for SharedObject?  If the app needs 1:1 conversation, we just need
to set up a filter or a private pipeline for messaging.

Ok this thread may well be sent to the dev list because the design issues
need to be discussed further.




_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to