> And you just need one line in your flex code: > NetConnection.defaultObjectEncoding = > flash.net.ObjectEncoding.AMF0; > when red supports amf3, just delete the line.. no worries at all >
Unfortunately, this is not correct. I have had dozens of discussions with adobe people and people on the lists, and so I am fairly educated on this issue. What you are talking about is that at the low level, you can turn on AMF0 support. But Macromedia no longer supports remoting with AMF0 and if you just try to use remoteObject with flex and just set AMF0, it will *not* work. The problem is that remoting != AMF0. Remoting is *built on top of* AMF0. Its like just because you have tcp/ip doesnt mean you have mail. When adobe built their new remoting model for Flex, they decided not to make it backwards compatible with AMF0. Amazingly they decided they could make it compatible with web services, but not with their own, existing technology. There are some people who have tried to do some hacks, with limited success. But at a mimimum, there is *much* more code involved than just changing/adding one line. One example of the problem is data conversion. For example data conversion of recordsets is something that I rely on extensively. With the old remoting model you could send a jdbc resultSet from the server, and it would automatically be converted into a flash recordset. This is built into the remoting layer that sits on top of AMF0. So at this point it is clear that Adobe has totally abandoned and orphaned this technology in favor of a non backwards compatible remoting solution built on AMF3 and forcing people to pay for either FDS or ColdFusion for something that already worked. So I am just looking for an open source AMF3 compatible java server, since that is the only way I can see to work with my existing codebase short of some incomplete hack, or spending a month figuring out how to build wsdl files. Regards Hank > > On 6/18/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Is supporting AMF3 in the near term roadmap? > > I have been using openAMF and that project doesn't seem to be in > business anymore, and my entire project is based on being able to do > remoting in java. I remember some discussion about this but I am > wondering if it is a far off plan or if it is imminent. > > Regards, > Hank > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > -- > . m a r c o s a u g u s t o ; > > .e onde houver fé, que eu leve a dúvida. > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
