On 6/20/06, . m a r c o s a u g u s t o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, if the publisher publishes fast while the subscriber has a low bandwidth, the packets will be dropped. Of course, more improvements may be added if we have access to codecs and re-encode the frames. But as of now, we simply drop them.
Each subscriber has his own BWC and each BWC has a registered bucket for use. But it can be improved. Say we assign the BWC on client basis.
Hey guys.. about the buffer or bucket...
if one "camera" hav a good and one "tv" has a poor down..
If the bucket dosent hav limit the tv will display really older frames..
Then this tv hav to drop some frames...hehe... i missed something?
And each user hav its own bucket?
Yes, if the publisher publishes fast while the subscriber has a low bandwidth, the packets will be dropped. Of course, more improvements may be added if we have access to codecs and re-encode the frames. But as of now, we simply drop them.
Each subscriber has his own BWC and each BWC has a registered bucket for use. But it can be improved. Say we assign the BWC on client basis.
Joachim, and you all.. I'm working full time with red5 now and got usued to
John's fla structure (thanx J!), count on me for anything on the flash part...wanna help.
On 6/19/06, Joachim Bauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi Guys,
Attached is the chatlog of our dev. meeting today.
Joachim--
. m a r c o s a u g u s t o ;
.e onde houver fé, que eu leve a dúvida.
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
--
Best Regards
Steven Gong
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
