That would be great thanks, which branches are currently considered stable?

Kind regards,

Simon de Haan

Eight Media
+31 (0)26 38 42 440




On 5-jul-2006, at 12:17, Luke Hubbard wrote:

Hi Simon,

/java/server/trunk is 0.5 dev which is marked unstable at the moment.

We have made some changes to the mina jars, and usually compile with
eclipse so I will check that ant still works on a fresh checkout and
get back to you.

- Luke


On 7/5/06, Simon de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Joachim & Marijan

I ran 'ant clean' & it removed all the built stuff, afterward I rebuilt red5
again but I still get the error.
I'm trying to get it running from java/server/trunk, or should I be looking
in a different dev. branch?


Met vriendelijke groet,

Simon de Haan

Eight Media
+31 (0)26 38 42 440




On 5-jul-2006, at 11:03, Joachim Bauch wrote:


Marijan Miličević wrote:
Hi Simon,
I've been running our webcam with the 0_4_1 branch but would like to try
the SVN trunk. I've tried it but got the following error:

*Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.mina.integration.spring.InetSocketAddressEditor*

Anybody got some tips / ideas as to what the problem is? Am I missing a
.jar file or something on my classpath?
I believe jars have been upgraded by Joachim lately to new versions (mina +
some more). Ant build and some config files are also upgraded, so be sure
you have latest versions of all project folders (running "clean" ant task
after update also may help).

Yep, Luke and I recently updated to the latest versions of Jetty and Mina.
All dependencies should be resolved in the repository, so you might have
an old file somewhere in your classpath.

Joachim



_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list


_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list



_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to