Good to know, because I thought RTMPS is RTMP over SSL and not RTMPT. btw, with RTMPT I found (with Ethereal) that the flash player is not sending any additional arguments with the connect command, so it is difficult to do any authentication right at the begin (and I gave up going the RTMPT route), anybody else stumbled into that ?
On 9/13/06, Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > oliver oli wrote: > Amarish Khopkar wrote: > > > I also tried to use stunnel to wrap the SSL and not change the red5 server, > but didn't have much luck with that either. Could somebody please share how > they configured the rtmp protocol to work over an SSL encrypted secure > connection? > > hello, > > may this link helps: > http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashcom/articles/firewalls_proxy04.html > > i never used FMS, FCS or red5, but from reading the adobe tutorials i > came to the following conclusion: there are three protocols. plain rtmp > is the default, rtmpt (port 80) and rtmps (443) is rtmp tunneled over > http and https. which means that rtmpt + stunnel should should be a > valid rtmps connection. keep in mind that this is all speculation. i > will test it, soon. > > > aparantly rtmps is http tunnel over ssl, isnt that slow ? > > > have you tried a rtmpt connection with red5? > > Ive setup http tunnelling as a fallback for firewalls which works > wonderfully, ive posted my AS3 NetConnection helper class, it does require a > tiny extra bit of work, if there are improvements please post back. > > the very strange thing is the flash 9 player is suppose to do fallbacks so > check on 1935, 80, 443or whatever the ssl port is, however it doesnt ! this > is for red5 and FMS so i had to kludge my own fallback. > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > -- Roberto Saccon _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
