|
Hi, I am streaming 800 MB video using Red5. And it looks like
Red5 is trying to put all the 800 MB into RAM. Taskmgr -> java.exe 632 MB now … crazy huh? Running
Red5 0.5 for windows Because than it seems like unusable for bigger CDN. Any ideas? … would be great if red5 gets only the data
he needs to stream in an actual moment? Week ago I saw some streaming server written in C (for FLV
as well, using progressive download) … but what was great: 1) when someone
wants file, it gets enough for some proper time and it knows that when client
is going to the end of that watched part he must get more. 2) When another
client connects to server, server has queue table and has mapped the files on
hardisk … so he is doing job like delivering the files, which are most
closer to actual position of reader on harddisk. So the harddisk reader is not
jumping from one side to another side, but thinking about how to deliver all
the streams in the most effective way 3) When user
pauses the stream, it stops delivering data to client … so it just doesnt
waste the content delivering possibilities 4) It can
handle on P4 3,4 GHz, RAID, 4GBRAM about 4000 simultaneous clients And I am just asking. What is the difference between
delivering the streams by RTMP and progressive download. Is RTMP better? Why? And also if there is any possibility of tuning Red5
streaming capabilities, because, it’s really cool server and I just want
to give you some advices how to tune it, but for sure you already know these
tricks. Thanks for everything. Tom |
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
