On 11/10/06, Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yeah, it make sense, and that's what i've been trying to do today but i haven't found how! i've learned some goodies about Red5, but not the goodie i was looking for xD
John, i don't have red5 installed at home so till monday i won't be able to see my modified code but please keep me informed in this thread about what you get, and if i can help you with anything just let me know. If you come to me with some running code i can "comment it for dummies" so it could be a sort of documentation for someone to know how a not-too-simple application works. What do you think?
Cheers
Carlos--On 11/10/06, Chris Allen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:That makes sense to me John. It will be great to have this one up and
running again.
On 11/10/06, John Grden < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really think we'll have to rely on a new connection method rather than the
> netStream to notify everyone. I think if we re-route that portion of the
> app, we can have it up and running.
>
> Make sense?
>
> one of the sample apps has a demo of how to do a new client notification -
> i'll see if I can dig it up and create a new app that we can connect to for
> the VideoConference app.
>
>
> On 11/10/06, Storm < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > I'm pretty lost right now.
> > Please read through and correct me if i'm wrong:
> >
> > 1. streamPublishStart method on server-side is called when someone do
> stream.publish on client-side (in this case at method onSetID inside
> broadcaster.as)
> >
> > 2. no-cam users reach that line as well as cam users
> >
> > 3. there's no "streamPublishStart" invocation for no-cam users :(
> >
> > The reasoning is right, there SHOULD be an execution of that method
> everytime anyone connects, so either i've missunderstood how it works or
> something doesn't work properly or stream.publish does something annoying
> when called by no-cam users.
> >
> > any takers? John? Mr. Tanembaum?
> >
> > Yours
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/10/06, Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > Ok, i've just understood how that "streamPublichStart" works (i've been
> surfing the API). But i'm quite stuck now. Subscribers are nicely notified
> of incoming clients through the invoke of "newStream" in that method but now
> it's obvious for me that it won't be called when no-cam users connect. That
> newStream event ends calling Subscribe.subscribe at client side, method that
> YES, manage clients w/o cam by setting the _noStream.visible=true.
> > > So i've thought about creating a fake "newStream" event somewhere, but
> it won't work 'cause for cam users it would be invoked twice. What to do????
> I wonder if i can fake a stream for no-cam users so they would generate the
> desidered streamPublishStart call...
> > >
> > > By the glory of the super cow powers, help a poor guy! ;) It'd be great
> having a perfectly-working videoconf. demo for 0.6RC2 wouldn't it? ;)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/9/06, Storm < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/9/06, John Grden < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > first, excellent work on following that crazy code of mine ;) i'm
> impressed!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks John, it has been kinda hard since that has been the first AS
> code i've ever read, but you gotta do what you gotta do ;)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > second - yeah it's all coming back to me now! Instead of dealing
> with it at the new stream notification, we need to do it at the connection
> level - when someone connects, that's when everyone is notified. Then we
> need to match up that user's stream with their ID, and bam, I think we're in
> business.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Will try something in that line tomorrow (i'm in Spain, it's 21:02
> now and i'm at home) but there's something i want to ask you. Where are the
> calls to "streamPublishStart" method generated? because i cannot see any,
> idk if i'm mising some AS archive somewhere or if i'm missundertanding how a
> Red5 app works (that's pretty possible since i have only fuzzy idea).
> > > > If you were so kind to find out that for me i'd be able to sleep
> tonight without having nightmares with magically called methods lol.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a bunch:
> > > >
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/9/06, Storm < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, let's see if i can put together what i got and where i am:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At the begining when clients connected they randomly could see
> each other or they couldn't. Browsing the client code i found this at
> Suscriber.as
> > > > > >
> > > > > > private function doubleCheckTime():Void
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > clearInterval(si);
> > > > > > if(checkTime == stream.time){
> > > > > >
> > > > > > reset();
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I noticed that new clients cleared incoming streams through this,
> so i just commented the clear(); call and then that never happens again :)
> > > > > > Now clients that owns cams are working ok, but already connected
> users cannot see the noStream picture of any new client tho newer ones will
> see the pics for the already connected no-cam users (this shows that the
> list of clients is working properly, the problem is the notification of
> incoming users WITHOUT cam).
> > > > > > So...i left the client side for a while and started to have a look
> at the server Application.class (you didn't break your head to name this did
> you? lol j/k).
> > > > > > I was trying to see where the "newStream" calls are generated and
> it's here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > public void streamPublishStart(IBroadcastStream
> stream) {
> > > > > > // Notify all the clients that the stream had been started
> > > > > > log.debug("stream broadcast starts: " +
> stream.getPublishedName ());
> > > > > > IConnection current = Red5.getConnectionLocal();
> > > > > > Iterator<IConnection> it = scope.getConnections();
> > > > > > while (it.hasNext()) {
> > > > > > IConnection conn = it.next();
> > > > > > if ( conn.equals(current)) {
> > > > > > // Don't notify current client
> > > > > > continue;
> > > > > > }if (conn instanceof IServiceCapableConnection) {
> > > > > > ((IServiceCapableConnection)
> conn).invoke("newStream",
> > > > > > new Object[] { stream.getPublishedName()
> }, this);
> > > > > > log.debug("sending notification to " + conn);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When an user without webcam connects this method is not called
> (i've seen that following the logs step by step) so the current clients
> aren't notified of his/her arrive to the conversation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now that i (think that) know what happens ... how fix it? I hope
> someone colud help me...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carlos
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > "Nos gusta los domingos ir al parque a pinchar los globos de los
> niños para verlos llorar" .- Eskorbuto
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Red5 mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > [ JPG ]
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Red5 mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > "Nos gusta los domingos ir al parque a pinchar los globos de los niños
> para verlos llorar" .- Eskorbuto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > "Nos gusta los domingos ir al parque a pinchar los globos de los niños
> para verlos llorar" .- Eskorbuto
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > "Nos gusta los domingos ir al parque a pinchar los globos de los niños
> para verlos llorar" .- Eskorbuto
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> [ JPG ]
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nos gusta los domingos ir al parque a pinchar los globos de los niños para verlos llorar" .- Eskorbuto
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
--
[ JPG ]
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
