Hans Elgelid wrote:
What are the main advantages of AMF3 compared to AMF0?Found the following info from http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flex/2/langref/flash/net/ObjectEncoding.html AMF3 sends data over the network more efficiently than AMF0. AMF3 supports sending int and uint objects as
integers and supports data types that are available only in
ActionScript 3.0, such as ByteArray, XML, and IExternalizable. It is
available only in ActionScript 3.0 and with servers that use AMF3
encoding, such as Flex 2.Many people seem happy with SOAP/XML solutions and AMF0 is already faster than those. http://www.themidnightcoders.com/articles/soap_vs_flash_remoting_benchmark.shtml So maybe AMF3 isn't the most important feature now? Can somebody give an example of an application where AMF3 is neccessary? / Hans Elgelid |
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
