Hi there,
 
this badname functionality wasnt in 0.5. 
i havnt seen this badname problem with multiple broadcast streams
without subscriber.
what i experienced is that you cant republish under the same name when
there is still a subscriber connected to this particular broadcast
stream.
example:
1. broadcaster A broadcast stream "test"  -----> subscriber B,C,D
subscribes to stream "test".
2. broadcaster A broadcast.close() ----------> subscriber B,C,D still
connected to stream "test".
3. broadcaster A broadcast stream "test" ----------> badname!!!!!
 
i would suggest that badname is triggert when a second broadcast is
published under the same name.
 
I dont know FMS but i guess you do. Is this a bug. what do you think?.
In case we can open a ticket at jira!
 
 
BTW: my workaround is closing also the subscriber netstreams.
Republishing the broadcast stream under the same name. The broadcaster
sends a notification to the subscribers to reconnect. This will avoid
the badname (in this case!).
 
Happy new year.
-Adam-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
private
<http://www.versicherungen-abc.info/private-krankenversicherung/private-
krankenversicherung-middle.htm> Krankenversicherung
 
>Yeah, its definately a bug with the current CVS build of red5, when I
tried to revert back to the old 0.5 final version, it works fine =P
>On 1/3/07, Nankun Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> When I try to publish multiple streams into the same room, I keep 
>> getting the
>>
>> NetStream.Publish.BadName code even though the streams DO NOT repeat 
>> in names and the names are all valid strings. I don't know whats 
>> happening here. The exact same application works find in FMS.
>>
>> I am using the UUID generator tool in mx.utils.UIDUtil; to generate
my 
>> random stream-names. Can I reuse name of strings which has already 
>> been deleted?
>>
>> So far my experience with red5 for any kind of seriously development 
>> has been full of weird workarounds and bugs =(,
>>
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to