This may be off topic, but has anyone done a comparison between using OpenAMF for remoting and using the built-in remoting in Red5?
We've always used OpenAMF and I'm wondering if we used the same code to connect and call Java classes except point them at Red5, would there be a difference? For example, what does Red5 use for the standard Gateway in the connection URL (in OpenAMF, it's http://domain.com/gateway) Bill Jalmari Raippalinna wrote: > Joachim Bauch kirjoitti: > >> Hi Jalmari, >> >> Jalmari Raippalinna schrieb: >> >>>> It seems that sending arrays as parameters to services via >>>> NetConnection.call cause >>>> following trace to red5 output: >>>> jvm 1 | MISSING: readStartArray >>>> >>> Oh, I also tried sending simple value object from server to client >>> and got following errors (Object that contains String and two HashMaps): >>> jvm 1 | MISSING: writeStartObject >>> jvm 1 | MISSING: markEndMap >>> jvm 1 | MISSING: markEndMap >>> >> please make sure you are running the AMF3 integration branch from >> http://svn1.cvsdude.com/osflash/red5/java/server/branches/joachim_amf3_integration >> >> >> and not the trunk version (from where your output is generated)... >> >> Joachim >> > I'm quite sure I built the server from your branchs, although i did copy > the stuff from the dist on top of my old RC1 files (shouldn't matter, i > checked through conf files etc) to keep my apps there. > > - J > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
