yes sir stoica ionut.
that is excactly what i ment, i am sorry it my english is mimited =(
morten
From: stoica ionut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Red5] amfphp remoting vs. direct access to database
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:34:23 -0800 (PST)
I think that what he says is related to how he did
applications before red5, on fms/fcs.
I mean he probably had
1) frontend (flash player clients)
2) backend - amfphp
3) backend - red5 ( amfphp backend for red5 also)
4) db layer - sql server or something
and that when he had to CRUD from a database from the
server side actionscript, he had to use a second layer
( in that case, we all used amfphp or other remoting
as a middle layer to communicate to sql database)
But now, in red5, we have the opportunity to connect
directly to a database using jdbc, so what he asks is
what is more convenient ?
1) using red5->amfphp(or other remoting)->db server ?
or
2) using red5->jdbc->db server ?
Is this what you ask Criss ?
I was wondering on how to find about these things, and
then you place the question :)
What do you think guys ?
--- Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> I'm not sure what this has to do with Red5. We do
> support remoting AMF and
> AMF3 (coming next week) in Red5 too. As far as
> direct access, I'm not sure
> what you mean. Are you suggesting using the Socket
> class in ActionScript and
> encoding and decoding SQL communication directly on
> the Flash player? I'm
> pretty certain that you could pull it off, but I'm
> not sure how it would
> benefit you. A level of abstraction and the ability
> to communicate over port
> 80 (no firewall issues) are big pluses for doing
> database connections on the
> server side. Perhaps I simply don't understand your
> question though.
>
> -Chris
>
> On 2/6/07, morten hotmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> >
> >
> > I have tested out amfphp remoting and I must say
> it works like a charm =)
> >
> >
> >
> > I would just like to hear your opinion on using
> amfphp vs. direct access
> > to database?
> >
> >
> >
> > Which is faster? I figure maybe direct is faster?
> But I have nothing to
> > base it on.
> >
> > Which is more secure? I have no idea about this
> one?
> >
> > Which is more stable? (A remove homepage can "go
> down", without the
> > database being down)
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there other thing's to consider? Maybe another
> way, a built in tool I
> > don't know off?
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________
> >
> > Morten
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.28/672 -
> Release Date:
> > 06-02-2007 10:22
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_________________________________________________________________
Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.msn.dk/
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
