Hi When Red5 is freezed (block) I received no exceptions. The netstat -a show that server still listening on port, but connections are without success (what is the return message I don't know at this time). When the server is closing all the connections, client connection receive "Close" event. I put the console log on my web site http://www.planka.net/Red5Log.txt . There was not a lot of client connected on the server when it freezed, maybe 10, and only one or two of them broadcast video. Hardware is not heavy loaded - less then 50% CPU. My internet connection is 10/10Mbps and when there are cca 10 cams and 15 - 20 people is lest then 5Mbps traffic output. At this 'population' Red5 server freezing very often (few minutes). In this log are exceptions too, which are thrown when one try to connect when Red5 is in middle of startup process. You can noticed a few restarts in those log which I was make. About how many connections are supported, I agree that it's depends on hardware. When I made over 200 connections which was received the same video stream I reduced the video quality, but everything was stable?! I tested the r1743 yesterday, and there is the same situation. I have fillings that r1736 is better, but this is just fillings. And appDisconnect or appLeave methods are still not called when someone clossed the browser. This mess my people list ;) Brane _____
Od: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namesto Adam Poslano: 27. februar 2007 20:32 Za: [email protected] Zadeva: Re: [Red5] How many connections can red5 support? Hi vsivak, hi Branko , hi all, when red5 quits accepting connections what does your logs says?. red5 keeps logging or is the logging also stopped?. what net events the clients are receiving? ived opened a ticket <http://jira.red5.org/browse/APPSERVER-21?page=all> http://jira.red5.org/browse/APPSERVER-21?page=all where red5 halts. isnt accepting any connection. the cam broadcaster receives a unpublish.success. the subscriber netconnection closed. apart from this nothing. no logging, nothing! if iam right this was caused by some memory leak problem. this should be fixed with r1743 (see the ticket). r1743 ive tested with 120 clients and it worked preaty well. unfortunately i could not increase the client count because i did all on my dual core machine and it was at 80-95% cpu load. red5 took about 10-30%. firefox, ie, opera, ns, etc. took the rest. may be i rerun this test where LAN clients will connect. (btw thats the only diffrence to my previous tests where Lan clients where connecting.) having lees time. about how many connections are supported?: when a clinet connects there is a minor increase in cpu load. when bulk amount of clients connects at the same time you will see this distinct. but while a stream is served and disconnecting there is no significant cpu load. so it depends on your application and hardware. that are my experiences for live cam streaming. regards -Adam- >Oooh, I think that the same problem has been described here before two >or three months. You say that it is not solved up to now? It's not good >message for me. >This is one of the biggest BUG in the red5... and still not solve. Vrrrrr. >Branko Pecnik napsal(a): > > Hi > > Hm. I make a lot off more connections at the same time, about 200 ? > 250 connections which receive one video and one audio stream. This was > worked nice and very stable at local. So I put my VideoChat > application on the web??. Then the nightmare was begun. After random > time, random number of clients connected and random number of > publishing and receiving video and audio streams, the server BLOCK > (working periods are second, minute, hour, couple of hours, even a > day) . It disconnects all connected users and no one can connect to > server until it is restarted. Then when I restart the server in most > cases the server still reject the connections if one try to connect > when server is in starting process. So I must pull out the network > cable, restart the server and switch cable back to network card. After > that is often that server BLOCK again in a second. I suppose that is > because a lot off users try to connect in the same time. So I must > repeat this restarting method for a couple of times (sometimes 30 > times and more) when server start working again. I report this BUG on > JIRA weeks ago and it is not solved jet. I think no one have > application on that kind of stress situations yet, so let them know > now, Red5 is in development process yet. > > I think, number of connections is not critical. The critical are > simultaneous connections, disconnections, starting and stopping > broadcasting video and audio streams which is normal for this kind of > applications. I?m trying to make a test application which will > reproduce this BUG, without success yet. > > I think I have to write this post to lighting this problem again. > > Brane > > p.s. > > Sorry for my bad English. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > *Od:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Namesto *Storm > *Poslano:* 27. februar 2007 10:50 > *Za:* [email protected] > *Zadeva:* Re: [Red5] How many connections can red5 support? > > Earlier today someone posted a test with 50-60 concurrent connections > of 120 clients connecting and disconnecting and it was successful. > > On 2/27/07, *Salil jain *<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > hi, > I would like to know how many connection red5's current release can > support. I have dropped red5 10 months before as it couldn't handle > lots of connections, so would like to know so i can use it for my next > project. > thanks > Salil __________ NOD32 2083 (20070227) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
