Jerky video is better than no video at all. If you are in a video conference and your bandwidth is limited, I think the best result is you still can hear others talking and see some of the motions of others.
On 3/15/07, Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Steve > > > A simple usage model might be: > In a live meeting session, when the bandwidth limit is low, you might > want > to bias the audio against video. So you could set the bandwidth of > video to > a low value (so that video will look jerky). And the audio sounds just > fine. I read the FMS speeds up the audio to keep up with video or something like that when its being slowed down. I dont think jerky video is the expected output at all, its what currently happens, ive tried everything to get a nice smooth rate without frames being dropped. I did notice that a quality setting minus 80 works better than 90-100 but its too blocky to be useful. We're trying to live stream at 240x180 video size though which was ok for windows media streaming via the encoder. I dont think jerky video is of much use for vod streaming also. > > There're many other usage models. You can also contribute your own > here. I > just provide a framework to make them feasible. > Ill have to spend time to test things out, i wonder if the server can do dynamic buffering if not enough video data is being pushed out ? _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
-- I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore Best Regards Steven Gong
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
