Hi Luiz, I think that your problem might be the constant updating that's going on with your application. If you have all these shared objects being updated every 0.1 seconds or so that can get to be a lot of traffic very quickly. I would look into using a solution like Brian is suggesting and use an NetConnection.call() for the updates.
You could also look into creating Scopes on the Java side as you need them, and funnel everything through your main ApplicationAdapter with NetConnection.call()s. Then just have Flash poll on an interval of some sort when updates are needed. There are lot's of options here, so let us know how it goes, and what works best for you. Anyway, as for FITC... I think I might start a new thread for that, but in the meantime here's what's up for Red5 at the conference. John and I are presenting on Red5 on Sunday morning at 9AM, and I have another presentation on Building Red5 Applications on Monday at 11:30 AM. I look forward to seeing you guys that can make it there. -Chris On 4/20/07, Luiz Filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Muriel, how´re doing. > > I have a different case to say you. > > On our project we´re having the same problem with sharedObjects on Red5 > 0.6r3 (or latest, doesn´t matter), let me explain: > > Our project is a Card Game project based on a lot of rooms (subScopes) and a > main Lobby (parentScope). > We are using 5 sharedObject on MainScope and 1 SharedObject for each room. > Today we have been 300 connected users playing our game, we was all the time > looking cpu usage, and i can tell you that it is always on a 99% of usage. > After a while Red5 freeze again. > > I´m thinking to change our approach of SO´s to Server-Side <-> Client-Side > methods, i´m wondering that it will be better. > > We´re very desperate to solve this issue, anyone has another opinion ? > > Thanks, > > Luiz Filipe. > > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de > John Grden > Enviada em: quinta-feira, 19 de abril de 2007 13:55 > Para: [email protected] > Assunto: Re: [Red5] RMI or Shared Objects > > Me too, I was just about to say the exact 2 things Jake said! > > BRIAN - you lurker you ;) > > > On 4/19/07, Jake Hilton < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I knew it! .. I felt a lurker such as your self.. LOL :) > > > > But on topic.. I don't use shared objects much .. but use nc.call's for a > lot of my interaction. > > > > Jake > > > > > > > > On 4/19/07, Brian Lesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Muriel, > > > I'm just a lurker here and am not using Red5 but was wondering what you > > > mean by: "as the Shared Objects are emptied after a message has been > > > received"? > > > Yours truly, > > > -Brian > > > > > > muriel wrote: > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > > >we just had an interesting discussion with a Flash expert about Shared > > > >Object communication. Until now, we have been using Red5 Shared Objects > > > >for client-server communication in a multiplayer game setup. As we have > > > >all kinds of communication (broadcast to room, some users, single > user), > > > >we have set up an architecture with two Shared Objects per client (two > > > >distinguish input from output). We are now observing some performance > > > >problems on the clients as well as the Red5 server (99 % CPU usage with > > > >33 clients updating the Shared Objects every 0.1 seconds, btw with 33 > > > >clients 66 Shared Objects have to be handled by the server). On the > > > >server-side, however, we don't have any memory problems, as the Shared > > > >Objects are emptied after a message has been received. Memory is at > > > >around 4% and remains quite stable throughout the application. > > > > > > > >The Flash (Media Server) expert proposed to use an invoke of a > > > >client-side method rather than a Shared Object as this is more > efficient > > > >for the client to handle. Do you think the server performance issues > > > >could be due to the Shared Objects? And does it make sense to change > > > >from Shared Object communication to RMI? > > > > > > > >Is there anyone who has experienced similar problems? > > > > > > > >Thanks for helping, > > > >Muriel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Red5 mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > Brian Lesser > > > Assistant Director, Application Development and Integration > > > Computing and Communications Services > > > Ryerson University > > > 350 Victoria St. > > > Toronto, Ontario Phone: (416) 979-5000 ext. 6835 > > > M5B 2K3 Fax: (416) 979-5220 > > > Office: POD B-66-C E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > (Enter through LIB-B99) Web: http://www.ryerson.ca/~blesser > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Red5 mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > -- > [ JPG ] > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
