it really seems to be improving! :) strange but i won't complain ;)))
BufferLength: 5.295
FrameRate: 21.13
cheers!
henrik
henrik weber wrote:
:)))
nice one! signal is much better than before (yesterday's first version)
and although i have here only a 3MBit-line i get the following values:
BufferLength: 3.496
FrameRate: 19.72
it stutters a slight bit (but good enough to use it) but i guess this is
related to my line and the location (germoney)...
rock on!
henrik
btw: while i'm writing the connection seems to get more and more
stable; cool!
--
__digitalspices__
Henrik Weber [MediaDesign&FlashDevelopment]
home: www.digitalspices.com
Interalab wrote:
On arrival at my office, I found the laptop running fine, but the
publisher movie in a non-active condition. It had failed sometime
between 10 pm EDT and 6 am EDT (I'm not sure how far off from GMT we are
in eastern daylight savings time, so adjust based on Andrew's
observation). I refreshed the publisher browser and it immediately
started streaming again. I'm not sure what to make of that. The server
had no problem accepting the refreshed stream and I never lost
connection to the shared objects (I'm using them to count users and a
couple of other things). At the moment, I'm going to blame the
camera/publisher, as there are no unexpected errors in the red5 log.
Current stats:
We've had 163 connections to the stream since yesterday at 5 pm.
Peak concurrent connections was 7 (resulting in about 1.9 Mbps in
bandwidth use at the time)
Mem: 963164k total, 852984k used, 110180k free
Swap: 2819368k total, 251056k used, 2568312k free
Cpu(s): 0.3%
uptime 14:26
Streaming at 320x240, 24 fps, 80% quality, 22k audio, approx
300-400kbps publisher.
Andrew Herron wrote:
Hmmm... well I am trying to watch the stream now 06:55 GMT on Thursday
and I see a brief flash and then nothing except 'Buffer length' and
'Framerate' which are both 0
It clearly was doing good things earlier so maybe the camera or your
laptop have caused a problem?
Andrew
On 4/26/07, *Sales Department* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
There was a change made to the trunk (I think by Joachim) in
> > org.red5.server.stream.PlaylistSubscriberStream
This line appears to have been removed. The purpose of the
section was to manage something to do with low latency/low
bandwidth connections, but it seems that it also introduced some
choppiness. I haven't seen the hiccups since we compiled the
latest trunk.
> >
> > if (pendingVideos > 1 || writeDelta[0] > writeDelta[1]) {
> >
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Rossi" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:51:28 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: [Red5] live test - again
Hi its fine now, what did you do ?
Storm wrote:
> It's working pretty well here (from Málaga, Spain). "BufferLength"
> says: 1.858 all the time, and i've just noticed a few macroblocks in
> the video by they're gone now.
>
> On 4/26/07, *Interalab* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> I have updated to the trunk revision 1932 which does not
contain the
> "pending videos" code.
>
> We're re-launched the live camera (pointed at the road
again) and will
> leave it up all night. Please take a look and report back on
> quality if
> you have a chance.
>
> http://www.magicoast.com/media_center/embedded_player.html
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped test this today.
>
> I guess this was a day for testing . . . the video
conference and the
> multiple streaming tests seemed to go well too!
>
> Bill
>
> Al Melquist wrote:
> >
> > Video stream stopped
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] *On
> > Behalf Of *Lenny Sorey
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:18 PM
> > *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > *Subject:* Re: [Red5] live webcam test
> >
> >
> >
> > Joachim,
> >
> >
> >
> > I made your suggested change bellow and recompiled.
> >
> >
> >
> > Now the streaming side seems to be back working.
> >
> >
> >
> > Exactly what impact does this change make?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Lenny
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/25/07, *Joachim Bauch* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Klaus,
> >
> > Klaus schrieb:
> > > Check conf/red5-common.xml
> > [...]
> > > Remove the bean with
> org.red5.server.stream.SimpleBWControlService and
> > > remove comments around the bean with DummyBWControlService.
> >
> > this will only change the way Red5 uses the bandwidth
settings
> defined
> > in serverside code.
> >
> > Another thing you could test is changing line 1780 in
> > org.red5.server.stream.PlaylistSubscriberStream from
> >
> > if (pendingVideos > 1 || writeDelta[0] > writeDelta[1]) {
> >
> > to
> >
> > if (pendingVideos > 1) {
> >
> > Recompile and restart Red5 afterwards. This will change
the handling
> > of slow client connections to drop less frames. However
without
> this
> > check, I had issues with clients from low-latency,
low-bandwidth
> > connections. You seem to have high-latency, high-bandwidth
so maybe
> > we need different checks to handle both cases.
> >
> > Please let me know if this helped with your problems.
> >
> > Joachim
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5 mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
<http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5 mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> If a man speaks in a forest and his wife is not there, is he
still wrong?
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
