Dan,

On 5/21/07, Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thats what im trying to work out aswell, if its not possible, its going
to be impossible to cluster properly ?


Yes, this thing is kind of tough. I will look into DMI for a solution.

Steven Gong wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
> Thanks for your mail. The problem I got when trying to cluster the
> server is not related to Spring really but is due to the broadcasting
> between the server nodes. We have a "Subscribers with Broadcaster"
> model in both live stream and shared object cases, where one
> broadcaster needs to broadcast events to several subscribers that
> might be connected to different server nodes.
>
> Currently for a non-clustering version, we use a list for subscribers
> that have subscribed to a specific broadcaster but I don't know how to
> use TC to cluster this model. Do you have any idea about this problem?
>
> On 5/19/07, *Eugene Kuleshov* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
wrote:
>
>
>     Guys,
>
>       I am one of the developers who implemented Spring support for
>     Terracotta
>     DSO, and I have really good idea what it can and what it can't do.
>     On the
>     other hand I know really little about red5, so please bear with
>     me. :-)
>
>       So, can you please explain to me what data exactly you need to
>     cluster in
>     red5?
>
>       Can you also elaborate on what makes it difficult for you to
>     learn for to
>     integrate Spring?
>
>       Also, I don't quite understand your concerns about standalone
>     vs. tomcat
>     (or other web servers). It is your own choice actually and
>     Terracotta works
>     in both cases.
>
>       It might be easier for you to get your questions answered in the
>     Terracotta mailing lists (tc-user or tc-dev) that you can
>     subscribe to at
>     http://terracotta.org/confluence/display/orgsite/Mailing+Lists
>
>       regards,
>       Eugene
>
>
>
>     Dan Rossi-5 wrote:
>     >
>     > I think i hit a wall already, in this integration examples it
>     says to
>     > load an application context file , im assuming its the
>     red5-web.xml for
>     > each webapp, however all the bean id's are named the same ie
>     > web.handler, i took a look at the war configs and they are named
>     > differently, still not sure what to put in here
>     >
>     >
>
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/docs1/Integrations+Spring#IntegrationsSpring-Howtouseit
>     <
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/docs1/Integrations+Spring#IntegrationsSpring-Howtouseit
>
>     >
>     > Dan Rossi wrote:
>     >> Ok damn, just checked out the samples and seems like its going
>     to take a
>     >> while to learn to integrate with spring, in a standalone and
tomcat
>     >> situation. Ill just continue on this custom stats logging and
>     come back
>     >> to it :)
>     >>
>     >> Dan Rossi wrote:
>     >>
>     >>> Hi Im going to be looking at this scenario very shortly,
>     however does
>     >>> this setup have its own caching and RMI mechanisms , or will I
>     still be
>     >>> using the internal one setup in red5. What is the benefits of
>     using
>     >>> something like this with tomcat as oppose to stand alone ? I
>     do find it
>     >>> a PIA to make the updates i need, where a war file into tomcat
>     is so
>     >>> much simpler just to update the server and applications.
>     >>>
>     >>>  From looking at the demonstration video, im curious to know
>     if its
>     >>> going to be  possible for red5 apps to share the same
>     published names.
>     >>> Ie, publish a broadcast to our load balancer ip which chooses
>     a server
>     >>> and then starts archiving to our SAN, and then the subscribers
>     are also
>     >>> connected to the load balancer, and when a broadcast has
>     happened, all
>     >>> connected clients will get the call being sent from the
>     application to
>     >>> switch to the stream. This would be most interesting to see if
its
>     >>> possible.
>     >>>
>     >>> Let me know what others may be doing with it.
>     >>>
>     >>> thanks.
>     >>>
>     >>> Dan
>     >
>
>     --
>     View this message in context:
>     http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-%2B-Red5-tf3775671.html#a10690836
>     <http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-%2B-Red5-tf3775671.html#a10690836>
>     Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com
>     <http://Nabble.com>.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Red5 mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small
> needs it never asks, or knows or remembers.  -- Tagore
>
> Best Regards
> Steven Gong
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>


_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org




--
I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it
never asks, or knows or remembers.  -- Tagore

Best Regards
Steven Gong
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to