n 6/20/07, Evgeniy Strokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello, as far as I understand, Red5 could be used instead of LiveCycle Data
> Services. Am I right?

Yes! That's correct. Full support will be coming soon. Joachim just
got mx:RemoteObject is working in the trunk  So far we have only
implemented the messages that are used when invoking remoting methods.
however, the rest of it will come soon, and will be released with the
next major release.

> Is this the main purpose of Red5?
> Please clarify.
>
No, it's not the "main" purpose of Red5, but it's certainly one of
them. Most users are taking advantage of the media streaming aspects
of the server, like video and audio streaming, both on demand and
client to client. Red5 supports shared objects, so building multi
player games and text chat applications is relatively easy. Red5 can
be also used for Flash remoting, XML-RPC, and can easily tap into any
existing API written for Java.

I like to think of Red5 as a bridge for the Flash Platform. Whether
it's streaming video, passing AMF objects over http or sending Midi
data from the Java sound API, it's always doing the job of linking
Flash to the outside world.

> Thank you

No Problem! Let us know if you have more questions.

-Chris

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to