I run it on Ubuntu in standalone mode, but I develop in WinXP 64. Paul
On 9/10/07, Jason Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It basically depends on how well you know Linux. > My preferred distro has (yet again) swayed back to Slackware. It's > small, it's robust and the 1 ISO you need to install contains everything > you need and then some (In 2007, it's strange to actually be > de-selecting packages from the first installer ISO of a Linux distro, > then not have to download anything else). > > We use CentOS on a couple servers at work, it's a good little operating > system, but what I like the best about Slack is how it stays out of my > way. > > If you decide BSD, remember how they break down: FreeBSD is for people > who want speed, OpenBSD is for people who want security and NetBSD is > for people who want UNIX on their toaster. > > Jason > > Donnacha wrote: > > If you had to pick one OS for a Red5 server, which of the following > > would it be ... and why? > > > > CentOS > > RHE > > Debian Stable > > Fedora Core > > Ubuntu Server Edition > > > > ... or might one of the BSDs be a better option: > > > > FreeBSD > > OpenBSD > > NetBSD > > > > > > Very curious to hear your answers! > > > > Donnacha > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > -- It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. - Voltaire
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
