I think the PageBuilder process and SQL server stamp all over each other for
resources on the server, and that Disk IO is the one which gets really
hammered.  It may be possible to achieve good performance with two disk
arrays in the server and a whole lot of RAM but if you're going down that
road you may as well just use two servers for the job.

In fact the publishing process is so heavy weight RedDot recommended we have
two RedDot servers.  One for content editing (0 asynchronous processes) and
one for publishing tasks (as many asynchronous process as the server will
take).  Plus a separate box for SQL.

Of course I'm sure this had nothing to do with sale of another server
licence :)

Keith.

On 19 March 2010 13:32, [email protected]
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I've always heard this maxim, and follow it myself, but I've always
> been curious about WHY separating them yields better performance.
> You'd think that things would be smoother if the data didn't have to
> travel over a network between storage and processing, but I guess it's
> not the case.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Mar 10, 12:50 pm, "Prasanth Nittala" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Bobby,
> >
> > CMS and SQL Server being seperate servers is the way to go for enterprise
> > standards. Else you would encounter performance issues. This is better
> from
> > architectural perspective in terms of scalability and extensibility.
> > Thanks,
> >
> Prasanth-------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > Prasanth Nittala
> > 213-814-4163 |www.oshyn.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From: bobbykjack <[email protected]>
> >
> > To: "Prasanth Nittala" <[email protected]>
> >
> > Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:01:48 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > Subject: [reddot] RedDot system requirements
> >
> > Just a quick straw poll: are you running RedDot CMS and MS SQL Server
> >
> > on the same physical server, or multiple boxes? Any recommendations or
> >
> > problems suffered with either approach?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "RedDot CMS Users" group.
> >
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<reddot-cms-users%[email protected]>
> .
> >
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en
> > [http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en].
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RedDot CMS Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<reddot-cms-users%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to