Adding a separate publication server will obviously take some of the
load off your CMS box, but keep in mind that unless your Database
server is up to it you will simply move th bottleneck and you won't
see the kind of improvements you might expect.

I would suggest that your first point of call would be some
observations on your system, trying to identify the part of the system
that is actually causing your performance problem.  There are
generally 3 suspects:
1) Template complexity - mixed pre-execute, navigation manager, render
tags, element referencing, and heavily nested templates?  You might
need to look at your CMS server's RAM and I/O or better yet reduce the
complexity a bit
2) Database overloaded - RedDot puts an enourmous OLTP load on a
database, especially during publication as every element in every
template is merged through numerous single SQL calls embedded in the
old VB COM code.  It's pretty shocking really.  At any rate you should
have your database hardware set up for OLTP throughput
3) Concurrency - RedDot makes heavy use of Session state and can
consume quite a lot of RAM per user.  If you have several *concurrent*
users, say 20 or more, you can start to run into memory headroom
issues.  This is because a 32bit process can only access about 1.5GB
of RAM (give or take), and that means about 60MB per user or less,
plus a bit for the shared system components.  That isn't as much as it
sounds.  A 64bit environment won't help you because all the COM
components are still 32bit.  Your best bet at that point is to beef up
your DB and add a second front-end server to help balance the load.
If you publish against a box with 5 users on it they will almost
certainly suffer performance issues.

Note that a "cluster" (misnomer) license will only really address
problem 3.
Hardware is cheap by comparison to every other type of solution.

Of course you could simply schedule your publishing overnight when
nobody is using the system - but I assume that's obvious enough that
you already thought of that and there is a reason you can't do it.

HTH.

Regards,
Richard Hauer
====================
5 Limes Pty Limited
www.5Limes.com.au

On Jun 25, 9:24 pm, reddotrich <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Has anyone had any issues or noticed any major improvments in
> performance when upgrading from v9 SP1 (we have got the .Net page
> builder) to version 10? Or heard if v10.1 (or v11 or whatever they are
> going to call it) has any major performance improvments? We are
> currently suffering performance issues with editors not being able to
> edit when someone else is publishing.  I understand that we may be
> able to opt for a cluster license to avoid this, but of course the
> management would like a. a cheaper option (hence looking at free
> upgrades) and b. evidence to back up the idea.  So if anyone has any
> stories to back up the idea, please share.
>
> Rich

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to