Hi Joel,

Please let me know if this is correct.  You have

[Page] John Smith
     [Container] con_contacts
          [Page] Contact Info 1
          [Page] Contact Info 2


In this case, you can do container to container reference

[Page] Faculty Contact Info
     [Container] con_contacts >> con_contacts

Since you said users do not have clipboard to do the reference.  That is 
fine, method #2

[Page] Faculty Contact Info
     [Container] con_contacts
          [Page] Contact Info 1
          [Page] Contact Info 2

Please note that content modules/pages can be connected to multiple 
locations.  In SmartEdit, click on the reddot for con_contacts, connect 
existing pages?

On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:25:34 AM UTC-5, Joel Kinzel wrote:
>
> Unfortunately our users are super simple.
>
> On Friday, November 9, 2012 3:24:02 PM UTC-6, Tim D wrote:
>>
>> reference the container to the old one (reference link in clipboard)? If 
>> you have SmartTree.
>>
>> On Monday, November 5, 2012 10:01:18 AM UTC-5, Joel Kinzel wrote:
>>>
>>> All: 
>>>
>>> We have the following situation: 
>>>
>>>
>>>    - A list of faculty members and their contact information. 
>>>    - The contact information is not on the faculty page, but is, 
>>>    instead a page inside of the container on the faculty page (we need to 
>>>    allow flexibility as some faculty have multiple sets of contact 
>>>    information).
>>>    - Need the contact info to show up on the list 
>>>
>>> Here is what we have:
>>> <reddot:cms><output type="object" 
>>> object="Escape:HtmlEncode(Context:Pages.GetPage(Guid:<%info_guid%
>>> >).GetElementByName(con_contactInfo).GetHtml())"/></reddot:cms>
>>>
>>> My questions is this: 
>>>
>>> Is there a way to render that container (or more specifically the pages 
>>> within the container) as if it were published instead of with the extra 
>>> markup?
>>>
>>> Right now, it includes all of the extra markup that is wrapped in block 
>>> marks (even when published) so we have been doing CSS display:none on the 
>>> items we want to hide. I'd rather they not appear in the markup at all. Is 
>>> there anyway to achieve that using a render tag (ie. can we specify which 
>>> render mode we want with gethtml)? 
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/XH1FyWeQUzgJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to