> That's you who started the debate...
> feel free to continue mailling me in private.
>
OK, let us continue this in private.
> A statement of experience ?
> Are you kidding ?
I'll ignore that.
>
> I think you have not so many mandrake experience to say such a thing.
> (quoting you : mandrakesoft don't care if it work... Just if it compile.)
> what you said is not true.
>
> > YOu know the rules as well as I do. These are *MY* opinions and are
> > therefore seperate from Red Hat. Did I post from a Red Hat account? No,
> > therefore insinuating that I am speaking FOR Red Hat is out of turn on
> > your part, for which YOU need to apologize. (Pretty dirty trick)
>
> I've never said this was the redhat opinions,
> i'm saying it is a redhat mailling list and that we do not do so on mandrake one,
> nor we will let people insult redhat.
>
Didn't sound that way, but I'll agree that insulting is not appropriate.
> however, people are free to say they prefer redhat or mandrake,
I agree.
> but they are not free to say the work of other is bullshit.( what you've done ).
>
I never said your work was bullshit, I said that it appears that
Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before releasing it.
> Now, knowing you're a redhat employee, it is even worse,
> because you should know we do not only make the things compile.
>
What company one works for does not matter. Also, I no longer work for
Red Hat. I am an ex Red Hat employee.
> > > Now come back and apologize.
> > >
> >
> > I apologize.. I expect the same in return for the above.
>
> read above
>
> Do i say your work is bullshit ?
> No i have not, and i do not plan to do so.
>
I never said your work was bullshit. That never came out of my mouth. I
stated you do not appear to do adequate testing since the same security
issues and problems that come with the Red Hat releases are in the
Mandrake as well as if it were just being copied over and recompiled
with no further testing being done. This in and of itself doesn't mark
something as bullshit.
> Your CV did not let me think you were knowing unix well.
> but i was probably wrong :)
>
ROTFL, What? You're kidding right?
> Nope, it was just a flamming return.
> I don't like people saying that we're just doing s'/redhat/mandrake/'
> on spec file. ( which would mean that if it only compile but doesn't work
> ( what you've said ) it is your fault :-) ).
>
> We do far more than that.
>
OK, I'll grant a flame was warranted from your point of view.
--
David D.W. Downey - Red Hat Technical Engineer
Assistant Site Manager - http://www.linuxnewbie.com
Resume - http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=96113
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
