[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven Boswell ) writes: > > Mandrake's developpers claims using gcc2.95 and say it's make a big > > difference. > > I figure it's worth a try :-) > > I got pgcc 2.95.3 pgcc != gcc. pgcc has been known to produce bad code before, so I wouldn't trust it too much. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Systems Engineer - distribution team Red Hat, Inc. -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Thomas Dodd
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... Alan Shutko
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... Alan Shutko
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... Alan Shutko
- RE: Why no i586/i686 s... Joseph Malicki