William (Bill?) T Wilson wrote:
Considerable time and training is also required to set up a
>Windows NT server for a corporate site that works at all; I don't
think
>it's possible to make a stable NT server, and the training
required for
>making one secure and efficient is at least as much as there is
for Linux.
And also wrote:
>Windows is only self-installing because the computers come with
it
>installed by the factory. It is certainly not self-installing
when you
>are given a CD and a blank hard drive.
I agree. I should perhaps have made it clear that I think ALL
current Client and Server OSs are imperfect from a wide range of
perspectives. I am promiscuous - I choose the least imperfect
system at the time of design, taking into account training costs,
costs of ownership, support needs, business needs. But I am also a
perfectionist and would like to see something better.
To go forward? Any suggestions?
Kind regards
Tony Wells
Phenomenal Books
"I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the
time to make it shorter" - Blaise Pascal.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bookstuff: www.phenomenal-books.com
anyotherstuff: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intnl tel/fax: +44 1524 845559
UK tel/fax: 01524845559
Mobile: (+44) (0) 370 963410
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
