On Tue, 30 Jun 1998, James Michael Keller wrote:
> Well, that depends. If your running a network were users might
> move from client to client - why not have the same account and pw for all
> of them? Assuming the "open" clients arn't using multi-user mode ( copies
> of the start bar, desktop, profiles, etc ) It's just going to be used to
> logon to the network anyhow.
True but this doesn't make much of a difference -- upon connecting to any
file services on the "new" machine (read: first-use machine by the given
user), they would have to make the appropriate connections anyways. For
protected shares, they'd have to enter a password. For non-protected
(public) shares, they wouldn't. This information would then be recorded
in the Win95 PWL file.
Doesn't matter whether they use "johnsob" or "Brenda Johnston" in this
case -- either will work, it is user-choice. But 'security = user'
doesn't. :-)
--------------< LINUX: The choice of a GNU generation. >--------------
Steve Frampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://qlink.queensu.ca/~3srf
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
