> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Paul Fontenot wrote: > > Why not argue this point on the developers mailing list? The thing works > > and that is all my feeble intellect cares about. > > > > > The next time you brag about your ignorance, try the windows-95 mailing > list... Can't be too ignorant I got your responce. If you would like to continue this discussion, do it off list. -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Lane J. Bryson
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Alan Shutko
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Lane J. Bryson
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Paul Anderson
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Lane J. Bryson
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Steve \"Stevers!\" Coile
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Steve \"Stevers!\" Coile
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Michael Jinks
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Paul Fontenot
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Douglas F. Elznic
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Paul Fontenot
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Scott McDermott
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Derek Balling
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Alan Shutko
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Lane J. Bryson
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Scott McDermott
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Scott McDermott
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Blair Craft
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Scott McDermott
- Lynx under RH 5.0 Damond Walker
- Re: How is linux not an O/S Was: Re: Wa... Bruce Tong