Hi,
[ Note: this messsages is cross-mailed to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Used system: Red Hat Linux 5.0, package sendmail-8.8.7-12.
It appears that the check_rcpt rule does not work properly when you run
sendmail with delivery mode "delay". In practice, you can now only put
the full IP address or name in the ip_allow or name_allow files, otherwise
the matches will fail (due to bad tokenizing, see below).
Here are the traces of a "-d21.21" SMTP session from client 192.87.153.26.
The /etc/mail/ip_allow file contains "192.87.153". The trace shows the
check_rcpt ruleset for the address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Trace with delivery mode "background":
-----trying rule: $+
-----rule matches: $: $( dequote "" $&M-$ $) $| $1
rewrite: RHS $&client_addr => "192.87.153.26"
$1: bfffcff0="<" bfffcff2="jos" bfffcff6="@" bfffcff8="simba" bfffcffe="."
bfffd000="xos" bfffd004="." bfffd006="nl" bfffd009=">"
rewritten as: 192 . 87 . 153 . 26 $| < jos @ simba . xos . nl >
-----trying rule: 0 $| $*
----- rule fails
-----trying rule: $={LocalIP} $* $| $*
-----rule matches: $@ ok
rewritten as: ok
rewrite: ruleset 194 returns: ok
250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Recipient ok
Trace with delivery mode "delay":
-----trying rule: $+
-----rule matches: $: $( dequote "" $&M-$ $) $| $1
rewrite: RHS $&client_addr => "192.87.153.26"
$1: bfffcff0="<" bfffcff2="jos" bfffcff6="@" bfffcff8="simba" bfffcffe="."
bfffd000="xos" bfffd004="." bfffd006="nl" bfffd009=">"
rewritten as: "" 192.87.153.26 $| < jos @ simba . xos . nl >
-----trying rule: 0 $| $*
----- rule fails
-----trying rule: $={LocalIP} $* $| $*
----- rule fails
-----trying rule: $* $| $+
-----rule matches: $: $( dequote "" $&M-# $) $| $2
rewrite: RHS $&client_name => "pegasus.xos.nl"
$2: bfffcff0="<" bfffcff2="jos" bfffcff6="@" bfffcff8="simba" bfffcffe="."
bfffd000="xos" bfffd004="." bfffd006="nl" bfffd009=">"
rewritten as: "" pegasus.xos.nl $| < jos @ simba . xos . nl >
-----trying rule: $| $*
----- rule fails
-----trying rule: $* $=w $| $*
----- rule fails
-----trying rule: $* $={LocalNames} $| $*
----- rule fails
-----trying rule: $* $| $*
-----rule matches: $: $> 3 $2
$2: bfffcff0="<" bfffcff2="jos" bfffcff6="@" bfffcff8="simba" bfffcffe="."
bfffd000="xos" bfffd004="." bfffd006="nl" bfffd009=">"
-----callsubr 3 (3)
rewrite: ruleset 3 returns: jos < @ simba . xos . nl >
...
... long trace of ruleset 3 omitted
...
rewritten as: jos < @ simba . xos . nl >
-----trying rule: $* < @ $+ . > $*
----- rule fails
-----trying rule: $* < @ $+ > $*
-----rule matches: $# error $@ 5 . 7 . 1 $: 551 we do not relay
rewritten as: $# error $@ 5 . 7 . 1 $: 551 we do not relay
rewrite: ruleset 194 returns: $# error $@ 5 . 7 . 1 $: 551 we do not relay
551 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... we do not relay
As you can see at the top of the traces, the tokenizing produces a different
result. Note that both traces are done with _exactly_ the same sendmail.cf,
ip_allow and name_allow files, except for the changed delivery mode option
in sendmail.cf.
Is this a known problem? Is it fixed already?
Regards,
--
-- Jos Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
