"Douglas F. Elznic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, Mar 23, 1998 at 07:42:49PM -0500:
> > This is the wrong approach and is not very dissimilar from spam. All
> > that would be accomplished here was to prove that we are well-connected
> > fanatics.
> >
> I guess you don't vote. How is a large number of well thought and well
> said arguments equvalent to spam. I did not say send the editors a buch of
> messages saying you suck and so does your article. In my letter to
> the editors I listed URL's to go to to clarify the discrepancies in their
> article and other useful resources. I have trouble equating what I did to
> spamming, but maybe you can clarify that for me.
Sure, I'd be happy to point out the discrepancies between this statement
and your original post:
"e-mails ([EMAIL PROTECTED])... I think that every member of
this mailing list should send a little blurb to the editors at
byte in regards to thier crappy article. It would be a grewat
showing of support for our beloved os."
"...a large number of well thought out and well said arguments" are
certainly not the same as hundreds of `blurbs'.
--
Scott
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
