On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 08:30, Brandon Caudle wrote: > I have moved > to 8.0 (Redhat) and it upgraded Bind to 9.2.1 so my configuration no longer > works. I can only think of a couple reasons why.
Don't think. Start named and look at the messages it sends to /var/log/messages. For the most part, bind 9 requirements are stricter when parsing your zone files. The messages should give you some hints as to what's wrong; you may be missing TTL values at the beginning of the zone or something that was not previously required. > 1) Does named.conf under /etc/ need to be owned by named (user and group) or > by root? As long as it's readable, it shouldn't matter, I think. Mine is owned by root:root. > 2) Does it need to be chmod 755? No, mine is mode 0644. 0755 is usually appropriate for directories. > 3) Is there anything wrong with my named.conf? Nothing that I see, but the messages file is more likely to give you good information than the list members, at least initially. > 4) The rndc.key is root (owner) and named (group) is there anything wrong > with that? No. > 5) If my host files worked with the last version and I haven't changed > anything in them should they still work with this version? Do you mean your zone files? Possibly not. The parser has changed, and some things that used to be implicit are not required to be explicitly defined. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
