On Tuesday 14 January 2003 08:38 pm, you wrote:
>
> I think you will find you DO have libc.so.6. It is rather fundamental.
> It is a symbolic link provided the glibc package.
Yep. It's a link in /lib to /lib/libc-2.2.4.so. So why does rpm gripe that it
can't find it? And is this what it should link to?
>
> I'm not sure why you are seeing such a message. What exactly did it say?
>
rpm -iv librpm404-4.0.4-8x.27.i386.rpm gave this output:
error: failed dependencies:
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by librpm404-4.0.4-8x.27
jp
"For any serious purpose, intelligence is a very minor gift." - G.H. Hardy
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
