We use smb to make the linux box look like a windows box. But I also connect using rdp. rdp lets you connect as a thin client to a windows server and gives you ms windows in your X11. There are a few problems but not that makes me go back to having ms as my os. Rick
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:13, Krishna Prabhu wrote: > I want to connect to Windows server as Client from a redhat7 system. Can > someone guide me how that can be done. > > thanks & Regards, > krishna Prabhu > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, 06, February, 2003 05:27 AM > Subject: redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #6664 - 15 msgs > > > > Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. RE: Mail is refused due to domain (Chris Mason) > > 2. Re: hde: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } & > hde: dma_intr: error=0x40 {UncorrectableError}, LBAsect=2947390, > sector=285256 (Txamoriq) > > 3. Re: Lilo root=LABEL=/ (Michael Mansour) > > 4. RE: Difficulties with APM on Dell laptop (Lon Lentz) > > 5. RE: Mail is refused due to domain (Cowles, Steve) > > 6. HELP---How to diagnose the NIC on PC? (Srini Amble) > > 7. Gnome 2.2 (Caleb Groom) > > 8. Re: Package Manager won't proceed in Redhat 8.0 (Felipe Leon) > > 9. Re: redhat-config-users (Bill Anderson) > > 10. Re: Gnome 2.2 (Samuel Flory) > > 11. RE: Difficulties with APM on Dell laptop (Matthew Saltzman) > > 12. Re: Gnome 2.2 (Gordon Messmer) > > 13. Re: HELP---How to diagnose the NIC on PC? (Michael Mansour) > > 14. RH8 mail client to HotMail (Danny Towler) > > 15. Re: RH8 mail client to HotMail (Matthew Melvin) > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 1 > > From: "Chris Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Mail is refused due to domain > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:37:38 -0400 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thanks, Steve, hopefully that will work. > > Short of using a smarthost, which I can do, how do other people configure > > mailservers so that they deliver internal mail internally and can relay to > > external MTA's also? > > I know most mail servers are not so anal about reverse lookups, so my > setup > > will generally work, but I want to have it perfect if possible. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On > > Behalf Of Cowles, Steve > > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:16 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: Mail is refused due to domain > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chris Mason > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:42 PM > > > Subject: RE: Mail is refused due to domain > > > > > > > > > Of course it can't talk to the nameserver, it's a > > > non-existant domain behind a firewall. > > > > > > The question is, why does it want to? Why doesn't the mail > > > server present itself as a company.ocm as that's the masquerade? > > > > > > > > > > Masquerading an e-mail envelope vs. the EHLO negotiation between the MTA's > > are two different things. Sendmail (like most mta's) is going to make a > call > > to the resolver libs to determine the FQDN (canonical domain name) of the > > host its running on at startup. It's this name that is used during the > EHLO > > negotiation with the remote MTA. IF the masq'd canonical domain name is > not > > resolvable by the external MTA's resolver libs, then (if configured) the > > remote MTA could reject your e-mail. > > > > With the above in mind, try adding the following to your sendmail.mc file. > > Change mail.mydomain.com to a resolvable FQDN. i.e. a FQDN that resolves > > from an external source. > > > > define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `mail.mydomain.com')dnl > > > > Steve Cowles > > > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:37:35 -0800 (PST) > > From: Txamoriq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: hde: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > & hde: dma_intr: error=0x40 {UncorrectableError}, LBAsect=2947390, > sector=285256 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:58:50AM -0800, Txamoriq > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:09:41AM -0800, > > > Txamoriq > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > I get those errors whenever I do a system rpm > > > > > > install/upgrade, sometimes after entering rpm > > > -Uvh > > > > > > <filename>, when it says "preparing", my > > > system > > > > > does > > > > > > not respond any further and I will have to > > > > > manually > > > > > > reboot the system. The weird part is during > > > fsck, > > > > > > there is no complains on bad sectors. Please > > > > > advice me > > > > > > on what I should do to solve this problem. > > > > > > The hard drive is connected to a Promise > > > PDC20276 > > > > > ATA > > > > > > 133 RAID controller acting as a ide card. > > > > > > > > > > Are you using an 80-pin cable between the drive > > > and > > > > > the controller? If > > > > > not, replace the cable first. > > > > > > > My hard drive is a ide device and not a scsi > > > device, > > > > would I still have to change it to a 80-pin > > > cable?? > > > > > > Yup. The newer cables - and you should have got one > > > with either the > > > drive or the controller - are required for the newer > > > stuff (ATA-66 and > > > better). I should mention it's an 80-wire cable, > > > not an 80-pin cable. > > > The connectors are the same as before. Here's an > > > article describing the > > > details on the new cables: > > > > > http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/if/ide/confCable80-c.html > > > > > > To quote: > > > "The 80-conductor cable was first defined with the > > > original Ultra DMA > > > modes 0, 1 and 2, covering transfer speeds up to > > > 33.3 MB/s. The cable is > > > considered "optional" for those modes. However, for > > > any Ultra DMA modes > > > above mode 2, the 80-conductor cable is mandatory." > > > > > > Cheers, > > > .../Ed > > > -- > > > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program > > > > The cables I'm currently and was using are > > 80-conductor cables. > > > > ===== > > I Am The Architect Of My Own Imprisonment. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 3 > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:37:57 -0800 (PST) > > From: Michael Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Lilo root=LABEL=/ > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Hi, > > > > > Ive been playing around with my partitions, but I > > > dont want to mess > > > things up, as it is very easy, when dealing with > > > partitions. I am using > > > LILO as bootloader, and it specifies the root > > > partition in the 'root=' > > > kernel option. > > > > > > My default configuration has this set to 'LABEL=/'. > > > Does that mean, that > > > the partition labelled as '/' will be mounted as the > > > root partition at > > > any time? > > > > If you look at both fstab and mtab, you'll find > > exactly what the partitions refer to. You can match > > them up from the mtab file. > > > > Labelling, as the man page suggests, is for making > > "the system more robust: adding or removing a SCSI > > disk changes the disk device name but not the > > filesystem volume label". > > > > > What if more then one partitions exist with that > > > label? > > > > I haven't tried that, but I would assume it'd be human > > error, you should always use different LABEL names > > when labelling partitions. > > > > > Is it safe to add another partition before my > > > current root, so that my > > > system will boot up correctly after adding (with a > > > different label then > > > /)? > > > > Yes, just make sure that whichever / parititon you're > > booting is actually your root partition. > > > > Michael. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 4 > > From: "Lon Lentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Difficulties with APM on Dell laptop > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:46:17 -0500 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > If the problem is because RedHat has not included ACPI in their distro, > > there is the option of downloading a vanilla kernel from kernel.org and > then > > patching it with the acpi patch(es) (I believe the project is available > from > > sourceforge). You would lose any RedHat kernel additions though. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Root > > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:24 PM > > To: Red Hat > > Subject: RE: Difficulties with APM on Dell laptop > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 21:54, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > > > > You might find some help here (found from www.linux-laptops.org): > > > > > > http://www.flagar.com/en/linux_inspiron.html > > > > > > It looks like APM in fact does not work on this machine. There's a > > > description there of getting ACPI to work with the latest Mandrake. > > > > > > > > Many thanks for the link, seems pretty clear its a no-no unless I switch > > to Mandrake, which I'm not going to do. > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 5 > > From: "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Mail is refused due to domain > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:59:37 -0600 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chris Mason > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:38 PM > > > Subject: RE: Mail is refused due to domain > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Steve, hopefully that will work. > > > Short of using a smarthost, which I can do, how do other > > > people configure mailservers so that they deliver internal > > > mail internally and can relay to external MTA's also? > > > > with regards to using sendmail... you have a choice of using the > mailertable > > feature or the local-host-names file to determine where mail for your > domain > > is delivered. If you want e-mail delivered locally on the same system that > > sendmail is running on, then add: > > > > mydomain.com > > > > to /etc/mail/local-host-names. > > > > If you want sendmail to relay all e-mail for mydomain.com to another > masq'd > > system for final delivery (like an exchange server), then add: > > > > mydomain.com: esmtp:[ip of other mail server] > > > > to /etc/mail/mailertable. > > > > > I know most mail servers are not so anal about reverse > > > lookups, so my setup will generally work, but I want to > > > have it perfect if possible. > > > > I also run a masq'd mail server behind my firewall. I had to add the > > confDOMAIN_NAME entry to my sendmail.mc file to get certain MTA's to > accept > > e-mail from my mail server. > > > > Steve Cowles > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 6 > > From: Srini Amble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: HELP---How to diagnose the NIC on PC? > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:05:22 -0600 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I am running Red Hat 7.3 on my PC. I have three LAN ports (one on the > mother > > board (eth1) and the other two on NICs (eth0 & eth2)). I can only activate > > the LAN port on one of the NICs. I cannot activate the other two LAN > ports. > > Whenever I try I get a failure. Can somebody help me with diagnosing this > > problem? Your help is very much appreciated. I see the following messages > in > > "/var/log/messages" file. > > ------------------ > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 network: Bringing up interface eth0: succeeded > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:04.0 > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 ifup: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: eth1: Unknown PHY transceiver found at > address > > 1. > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 ifup: Failed to bring up eth2. > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: eth1: Using transceiver found at address 1 > as > > default > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 network: Bringing up interface eth1: failed > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: eth1: SiS 900 PCI Fast Ethernet at 0xcc00, > IRQ > > 11, 00:0a:e6:36:c6:61. > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 ifup: Determining IP information for eth2... > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 dhcpcd[924]: dhcpStart: ioctl SIOCGIFHWADDR: No > such > > device > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 ifup: failed. > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 network: Bringing up interface eth2: failed > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > Your help is very much appreciated. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Srini > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 7 > > Subject: Gnome 2.2 > > From: Caleb Groom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Organization: > > Date: 05 Feb 2003 17:19:47 -0600 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Based on prior releases, is Red Hat likely to release an RPM update for > > Gnome 2.2 on RH8? without upgrading to RH8.1? > > > > I'm sure I'll upgrade without hesitation, just wondering if Red Hat will > > more than likely say "if you want Gnome 2.2, you should run RH8.1". > > > > TIA > > > > -- > > Caleb Groom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 8 > > Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 00:00:28 +0100 > > From: Felipe Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Package Manager won't proceed in Redhat 8.0 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >Hash: SHA1 > > > > > >On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:39:07 -0800 (PST), Miguelito Quijano wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>When I tried to install rpm using the graphical > > >>package manager in Redhat 8.0 System Tools, it will > > >>look for dependencies but after checking, it won't > > >>proceed and the mini-screen will disappear. How can I > > >>make this work? > > >> > > >> > > > > > >What error output do you get when you start it in a terminal > > >program, e.g. via > > > > > > xterm -e redhat-config-packages > > > > > >? > > > > > >- -- > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > > > > >iD8DBQE+QDJ00iMVcrivHFQRAkKuAJ99gSDnA5Oy9aPDT/naQurk5aOujACeMBCb > > >/FyCV1OI0KmB6k8Mn9sCV44= > > >=G8Ar > > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I run it in a terminal program it just does the same, a small > > windows appears and desappears immediately and no error is reported. Is > > there any way I can see what is going on? any log file or smthing? > > > > thanks! > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 9 > > Subject: Re: redhat-config-users > > From: Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Organization: > > Date: 05 Feb 2003 16:21:58 -0700 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 15:13, Richard Humphrey wrote: > > > I am having a problem with the redhat-config-users utility on version > 7.3. > > > When I try to run it from Gnome it starts up and then immediately shuts > > > down. What can I check to see why this is happening? > > > > Run it from a terminal, and report the traceback. > > > > -- > > Bill Anderson > > RHCE #807302597505773 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 10 > > Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 15:25:04 -0800 > > From: Samuel Flory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Gnome 2.2 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Caleb Groom wrote: > > > > >Based on prior releases, is Red Hat likely to release an RPM update for > > >Gnome 2.2 on RH8? without upgrading to RH8.1? > > > > > >I'm sure I'll upgrade without hesitation, just wondering if Red Hat will > > >more than likely say "if you want Gnome 2.2, you should run RH8.1". > > > > > > > Pretty much zero chance of a 8.0 update. > > > > -- > > There is no such thing as obsolete hardware. > > Merely hardware that other people don't want. > > (The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition) > > Sam Flory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 11 > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:26:30 -0500 (EST) > > From: Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Red Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Difficulties with APM on Dell laptop > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Root wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 21:54, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > > > > > > You might find some help here (found from www.linux-laptops.org): > > > > > > > > http://www.flagar.com/en/linux_inspiron.html > > > > > > > > It looks like APM in fact does not work on this machine. There's a > > > > description there of getting ACPI to work with the latest Mandrake. > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks for the link, seems pretty clear its a no-no unless I switch > > > to Mandrake, which I'm not going to do. > > > > Not a no-no, but definitely not for newbies. The patches *are* there, but > > you need to get them, patch your kernel, build it, and install it. Gives > > you an educational goal to strive for... > > > > -- > > Matthew Saltzman > > > > Clemson University Math Sciences > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 12 > > Subject: Re: Gnome 2.2 > > From: Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: 05 Feb 2003 15:28:06 -0800 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 15:19, Caleb Groom wrote: > > > Based on prior releases, is Red Hat likely to release an RPM update for > > > Gnome 2.2 on RH8? without upgrading to RH8.1? > > > > No, I don't think it is. > > > > > I'm sure I'll upgrade without hesitation, just wondering if Red Hat will > > > more than likely say "if you want Gnome 2.2, you should run RH8.1". > > > > Probably. > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 13 > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:34:02 -0800 (PST) > > From: Michael Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: HELP---How to diagnose the NIC on PC? > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Are eth0 and eth2 the same brand network card? > > > > Do you know the type of the integrated eth card? > > > > The most important thing here is that you load the > > drivers for your network card (whether compiled into > > the kernel or as modules). > > > > Make sure your kernel supports your card because if it > > doesn't ie. if you haven't compiled in support, then > > you'd not going to get this working. > > > > Michael. > > > > --- Srini Amble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am running Red Hat 7.3 on my PC. I have three LAN > > > ports (one on the mother > > > board (eth1) and the other two on NICs (eth0 & > > > eth2)). I can only activate > > > the LAN port on one of the NICs. I cannot activate > > > the other two LAN ports. > > > Whenever I try I get a failure. Can somebody help > > > me with diagnosing this > > > problem? Your help is very much appreciated. I see > > > the following messages in > > > "/var/log/messages" file. > > > ------------------ > > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 network: Bringing up > > > interface eth0: succeeded > > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for > > > device 00:04.0 > > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 ifup: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such > > > device > > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: eth1: Unknown PHY > > > transceiver found at address > > > 1. > > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 ifup: Failed to bring up > > > eth2. > > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: eth1: Using > > > transceiver found at address 1 as > > > default > > > Feb 5 16:50:52 DEVWS2 network: Bringing up > > > interface eth1: failed > > > Feb 5 16:50:57 DEVWS2 kernel: eth1: SiS 900 PCI > > > Fast Ethernet at 0xcc00, IRQ > > > 11, 00:0a:e6:36:c6:61. > > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 ifup: Determining IP > > > information for eth2... > > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 dhcpcd[924]: dhcpStart: ioctl > > > SIOCGIFHWADDR: No such > > > device > > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 ifup: failed. > > > Feb 5 16:50:53 DEVWS2 network: Bringing up > > > interface eth2: failed > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > > Your help is very much appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > Srini > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > redhat-list mailing list > > > unsubscribe > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 14 > > From: "Danny Towler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RH8 mail client to HotMail > > Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 09:46:19 +1000 > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Is there a mail client (rpm) for RH8 to connect to HotMail via http? > > > > Have looked at OpenWebMail and WebMail but no luck yet. Not sure if these > > are worth persisting with. I'm hoping to avoid the slow browser-based > > interface into HotMail and have the client do send/receives asynch. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 15 > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:55:46 +1000 (EST) > > From: Matthew Melvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Danny Towler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: RH8 mail client to HotMail > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 at 9:46am (+1000), Danny Towler wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a mail client (rpm) for RH8 to connect to HotMail via http? > > > > > > Have looked at OpenWebMail and WebMail but no luck yet. Not sure if > these > > > are worth persisting with. I'm hoping to avoid the slow browser-based > > > interface into HotMail and have the client do send/receives asynch. > > > > > > > I'm not entirely clear on what you're looking for.... but there is gotmail > > that acts like a fetchmail program for hotmail accounts.... > > > > http://www.nongnu.org/gotmail/ > > > > ... it only handles retreiving though... you still send through your > > local MUA/MTA. > > > > M. > > > > -- > > WebCentral Pty Ltd Australia's #1 Internet Web Hosting Company > > Level 5, 100 Wickham St. Network Operations - Systems Engineer > > PO Box 930, Fortitude Valley. phone: +61 7 3249 2552 > > Queensland, Australia 4006. pgp key id: 0x900E515F > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > __ > > redhat-list mailing list > > Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > End of redhat-list Digest > > > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
