On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 23:13, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:50:36PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > T. Ribbrock wrote: > > > > > >ITYM: "It will *not* be the RH we are accustomed to." Less emphasis on > > >stability, no point releases - that's definitely not the RH I'm > > >accustomed to... > > > > Who said that there will be less emphasis on stability? Red Hat Linux > > hasn't become a semi-annual printing of Rawhide... > > No. But in the past, the x.0 releases have *never* reached the same > stability level as the later x.2 releases. By scrapping the point > releases and putting more emphasis on "bring new features sooner", one > can expect that stability will suffer. Especially, as I do not expect > RH's Q&A to put as much effort in the "free" version as they do into > the Enterprise version. They never managed to get the x.0 releases > "right" (i.e. to what the point releases were) on first try, they > won't manage to do so now. > > Cheerio, > > Thomas
Please provide to me the source of your assertion that there will be no more point releases, because I have seen no such statement by Redhat. Are you guessing based on the lack of a point at the end of the title? Redhat did the SAME thing with Redhat 7. If the stability is going to suffer, itll be the same way that Mandrake, Suse, and companys' stability has always suffered, because redhat is not promising anyhting more than keeping up with the above joneses. Please try to refrain from fuding. Cheers, Ryan -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
