I agree, smacks of 'Lets jump on the band wagon' approach!
Marty ----- Original Message ----- From: "alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "redhat list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:19 PM Subject: Re: off topic- spam arrest verification request > On 11 Jun 2003, Randy Perkins wrote: > > > if you subscribe to spamarrest, > > just go ahead and blacklist my email address > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > i am not interested in supporting a process which requires me > > to validate my email address for every spamarrest customer that recieves > > my posts on this group. > > SpamArrest may seem good for the person using it, but it is a royal pain > for everyone else. > > I moderate a number of announce lists and I get a bunch of these things > every time I post an announcement. > > Think of the headaches if everyone used it. It is a "solution" that does > not scale well, if at all. > > At this point, I will be adding SpamArrest messages to my spam filters. If > someone is too clueless to set up a mail filter that does not require > human intervention for every sender, then they just won't get my messages. > > Besides... I expect the fake spammer address collection bot version any > day now. (Who still trusts "click here" links in unsolicited e-mail these > days?) > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
