On Thursday 10 July 2003 14:48, Edward Croft wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: <snip> > Hmmm, while I can understand why 'you' may not want HTML, there are a > lot of people who do like it. They feel they have more freedom to > dress up their emails, plus they can get online magazines and > supplier emails in HTML that show pictures. My company has marketing > materials that we send out in HTML, and no it isn't spam. These > materials are sent out after potential customers have requested them. > If I were to block off Exchange so that only text can get through, > our customers wouldn't get the full impact of our marketing > materials. So sometimes HTML is a good thing. Besides, people like > pictures. Hey, they are even pushing the cameras in your cell phone. > HTML emails can have more impact with the use of colors, formats, > fonts, etc. You can even use background styles. Here it may not be > prudent, but why force it on everyone. Disks are cheap these days > anyway. I have more concern over people sending MPGs. Just figured I > would give my 2 cents in defense of HTML email. Oh, and one other > thing, I have learned that it is not prudent to tell the CEO he can't > have something.
Those are all things that belong in a web page, NOT an email, sorry. -- Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instructions At End of Message, the +3 Clue-by-Four of No Attachments to a Mailing List, and the -4 Shield of No Spell Checker http://joseph-a-nagy-jr.homelinux.org -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
