On Thursday 24 July 2003 01:18 pm, Rick Warner wrote: > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 09:22, mark wrote: > > Well, I just read about RH "opening up the development process" to > > outsiders, over on ZDNet. *Then* I read the "system requirements" for 10: > > 200MHz for *non-graphical*, 400MHz for graphical...*minimum*. > > > > Does RedHat think they're the next M$?
No, I don't think so. > You're flogging the wrong horse. RedHat is in the distribution > business, not writing the software themselves. <snip> > The good news is, you have the > source, you can back in and slice, dice, and cut back to the minimum > necessary for your environment. Agreed. That's the biggest different between Redhat (or Linux in general) and MS. You have the freedom, you have the option to do whatever you want. You can do bloated install/setup, or trimmed down install/setup. With MS, you simply don't have any option. 'nuff said. RDB -- Reuben D. Budiardja Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN ------------------------------------------------- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML \ / email and proprietary format X attachments. / \ ------------------------------------------------- Have you been used by Microsoft today? Choose your life. Choose freedom. Choose LINUX. ------------------------------------------------- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
