I see this messaged when I have a multi-homed system with Microsoft Client
and File Print share serivces active for all interfaces, but usually I see a
different IP address in the error message such as:
 6 18:28:12 main nmbd[17890]:   This response was from IP
 192.168.254.60, reporting an IP address of 192.168.1.60.
When I see this type of message, then I just turn off Microsoft Client
Services and turn off File Print Share services on the interfaces that are
not on the same subnet as the Samba Server.  Your messages show the same IP
so I may be wrong, but maybe it will help in some way.

~smbinyon
sorry for the top post but thought I keep it straight.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba errors


I know what OS LEVEL does and in my experience it's enough to put a value of
99 or even 65 to win browser elections over winnt/2000 adn that's why when I
got these problems I tried to rise the value to 150 because I don't know if
with a value of 99 samba will win over winxp, but as I can see this is not
the problem here... because I still get those messages, so I'm a bit
confused about what is really the problem.

Alex
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jason Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: Samba errors


> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 13:11, Alex wrote:
> > Aug  6 17:52:50 main nmbd[17890]:   This response was from IP
> > 192.168.254.60, reporting an IP address of 192.168.254.60.
> > Aug  6 18:28:12 main nmbd[17890]: [2003/08/06 18:28:12, 0]
> > nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(112)
> > Aug  6 18:28:12 main nmbd[17890]:   query_name_response: Multiple (2)
> > responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.254.1 for name
> > WORKGROUP<1d>.
> > Aug  6 18:28:12 main nmbd[17890]:   This response was from IP
> > 192.168.254.60, reporting an IP address of 192.168.254.60.
> >
> > I get a lot of these messages on my rh9 machine with samba-2.2.8a-1 and
I
> > don;t know why or what should I do to fix this. Here is my smb.conf:
> > ...
> > All workstations are Win98 and WinXP and all of them have samba as their
> > wins server.
> >
> > I have also foud that at a certain point when I try to bowse the network
I
> > can only see a couple of computers (not even half of them). The same
> > smb.conf I had 2 months ago and everything was working just fine, but
> > now....
> > Can you give me some hints on what should I do and why does this happen?
>
> Based on the "multiple (2) responses" message, and the fact that you
> have occassional browsing problems, it sounds to me like you have
> competing domain masters.  Check your Windows XP systems to see if any
> of them are configured as a PDC.  Per the smb.conf manpage...
>
> "   os level (G)
> This integer value controls what level Samba  advertises  itself as  for
> browse elections. The value of this parameter determines whether nmbd(8)
> has a chance of becoming a local master  browser for the  WORKGROUP in
> the local broadcast area.
>
> Note  :By  default, Samba will win a local master browsing election over
> all Microsoft operating systems except  a  Windows  NT 4.0/2000  Domain
> Controller.  This  means  that a misconfigured Samba host can
> effectively isolate a subnet  for  browsing  purposes.  See
> BROWSING.txt  in  the  Samba  docs/  directory  for details."
>
> If you still have problems, I'd suggest performing some payload dumps on
> your traffic.  Unfortunately, it will take some advanced SMB experience
> to understand what you're seeing, so you might be better off just
> "tweaking <stuff>".  ;-)
>
> -- 
> Jason Dixon, RHCE
> DixonGroup Consulting
> http://www.dixongroup.net
>
>
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to