yes, fixing something that breaks something else is clearly a PITA. But I've just run
into
trying to install the new initscripts, upon the recommendation from a friend as part
of a
security tightening on my server. Well, the damn thing won't install as it conflicts
with
something else. this is driving me nuts.
chris
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999 06:16:59 -0500 (EST), rpjday wrote:
>
>On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Matt wrote:
>
>> perhaps you could keep the errata section of the redhat website, and also
>> have a service release section... that way people like myself who go to
>> the errata section and see a huge ammount of files, and are a tad unsure
>> of what there doing can go for the service release every few months and
>> download all the fixes in one huge rpm maybe :] (can rpm's contain several
>> rpms ??)
>>
>> If that was the case, it would only mean throwing the current rpms from
>> the last service release into a file and posting it - which to me sounds
>> like a dream for the consumer. specially people who want to have things
>> fixed properly, but cant spare the time to go searching for updated files
>> in directory every day to see whats new.
>>
>> Might be an idea to think about maybe
>
>not a bad idea, as long as there is no chance that installing
>updated rpms breaks anything that already works. you know,
>the way that *other* company does it ...
>
>rday
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
>as the Subject.
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
