On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 11:02:22AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> Seriously? Why would that be?
> 
> I've been wondering about this incredibly annoying issue for ages.

Simple. num_lock is regarded as a modifier key on most setups - quite
similar to Shift, Ctrl, Alt and Meta. So, obviously, for X num_lock+KEY
is something different than simply KEY, just as Ctrl+KEY is something
different than KEY. I assume it's possible to tell X not to regard
num_lock as modifier (my guess would be xmodmap), but I've never
bothered to find out... :-}

HTH,

Thomas
-- 
             "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"

     Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919
   "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to