Tom
I'm starting to feel like a tennis ball trying to follow your rants.
Less than a week ago you posted on your own site a long diatribe
on the impossibility of working with the E development group
Raster Mandrake and KainX
No appreciation for your efforts or the efforts of anyone but
themselves. You said you were never going to work with them again
and no one else should either. Mandrake still has the link on his
home page, but I see that you have removed your rant.
Today, in a 180 degree reversal, you now complain that Redhat isn't
including the latest version of E, even though you know that both
Raster and Mandrake said goodbye to Gnome compatibility on
anything but their terms when they started E16 development.
A simple example .....
Gnome insists on handling session management .........
Enlightenment insists on handling session management ..........
Guess what .... tell the rest of the world to F*CK OFF like these guys
did ....... and you're on your own.
You know that better than most others here.
Oh, by the way, I use E16 exclusively. I don't expect Redhat or
Gnome to deliver it - I take care of that myself and so do most others
that love Enlightenment.
Your whining is just the BS that paints all of us E fans as idiots.
Take it back to the e-develop list where this discussion belongs.
Earl Heather
On 26 Mar 2000, at 18:57, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to use this forum to attempt to get a straight answer from
> Redhat on this one :)
>
> Redhat 6.2 is shipping with an extremely, painfully out of date version
> of enlightenment (http://www.enlightenment.org)
>
> I work on this wm, and would like an explanation from someone at Redhat
> please. We have worked hard to improve the product, and 0.16.x is a
> league ahead of 0.15.x in terms of useability and performance. We have
> written several gui config tools and lots of documentation.
>
> snipppppppppppppp.....................
> Tom.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
