David,
> Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2?
> I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I
> have been unhappy with.
> It sort of seems like a downgrade for me.
That's an interesting statement. Can you elaborate? I've been around
since 5.1, and either this is the best upgrade (in my opinion), or I've
learned to avoid the land-mines. In the past I have had to do lots of
post-upgrade tweaks to get things working the way they "should", this
time around there are only 3 items on my list -- all local customizations.
The 6.1 -> 6.2 upgrade is not very "sexy." It's just an incremental
upgrade; I would argue that in this case "boring" is good -- it shows
that Linux (and the RedHat flavor thereof) is maturing.
There is a good chance/risk that 6.2 -> 7.0 with major upgrades to
the kernel (2.4.x), compilers (gcc-3.x), apache (2.x), etc. will be
more "exciting."
--
\Peter.
Research Associate / Linux Sys Admin.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
