-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> Can we lose the [RHL] prefix? It's silly, clutters up the list of
> messages, and generally makes it harder to read.
Harder to read?
> People who think they HAVE to filter on the subject heading are wrong.
> Here's some procmail.
You're assuming everyone uses procmail. You're assuming everyone knows
how to *use* procmail. You're also assuming everyone uses a system
capable of supporting procmail.
(Personally, I am an unabashed procmail fan, but ...)
- --------------< LINUX: The choice of a GNU generation. >--------------
Steve Frampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> interQ (Japan), Inc.
Systems Administrator/Software Developer http://www.interq.or.jp/
GNU Privacy Guard ID: D055EBC5 (see http://www.gnupg.org for details)
GNU-PG Fingerprint: EEFB F03D 29B6 07E8 AF73 EF6A 9A72 F1F5 D055 EBC5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5iho5mnLx9dBV68URAnilAJ9TY8vcgE22xabShr5iUtvl0GOD0wCfe/hn
ZmKcZ2JVK8j+aqCPuVrIIAI=
=rwuO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
