>Be that as it may, rpjday makes a good point. Many of us do get gobs of mail,
>and many of us are IT service types who get random mail from users all the
>time. A blank or nondescript subject line from the list looks just like same
>from a user. One I can ignore or put off; the other I must attend to at my
>peril. When every minute of my day is precious, the time spent weeding the
>mail spool adds up.
>
>OTOH, asking The List to modify its behavior is a little like standing out on
>the sidewalk and making similar requests of The World. Most of them won't
>hear you. Some aren't here yet. Many are about to leave.
>
>Bah. Subject lines are good. Please use them. This thread shall repeat
>once every 1-2 months until further notice. ;)
>
>-m
And for this reason the list appears to have voted down the [RHL] being
added to the subject line? Logic defies me. We want better subject lines,
but we don't want help with the subject line.
I'd love to have [RHL] as part of the subject line. So, even if the user
says nothing, or provide nothing to help, at least you'll know it is from
the list.
But, I guess it is not to be :-(
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart: Hey, why is it destroying other toys? Lisa: They must have
programmed it to eliminate the competition. Bart: You mean like
Microsoft? Lisa: Exactly. [The Simpsons - 12/18/99]
Visit - URL:http://www.vidiot.com/ (Your link to Star Trek and UPN)
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
