On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Steve Frampton wrote: > I hear this often, but I wonder if this is accurate. Is it not more > accurate to state that, since version 6.2 (6.1?), Red Hat installs xinetd > _by default_, but you can choose to install inetd instead? Nope, Red Hat 6.2 used inetd. You don't have to believe me, just look at the install CD, or an FTP mirror. No xinetd there. :) MSG _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Dave Wreski
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Nick Hudson
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Dave Wreski
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Nitebirdz
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Nick Hudson
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Gustav Schaffter
- RE: can anyone explain what this is? Rev David P. Giffen
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Wayne Dyer
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Steve Frampton
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Gordon Messmer
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Eddie Strohmier
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? Bret Hughes
- Re: can anyone explain what this is? John Aldrich
- Question about this Nick Hudson
- Re: Question about this Statux
- Re: Question about this Nick Hudson
- Re: Question about this Cameron Simpson
- Re: Question about this Charles Galpin
- Re: rh7.0 lock up Paul Anderson
- Re: Re: rh7.0 lock up rob smith