This is quite puzzling. And, if this is not the proper list for a gtk+
problem, please point me to the proper list.

  On my main system I have only gtk+-1.2.8 installed (from an rpm). However,
when I try to build the latest jpilot package from the source rpm (using the
--rebuild command), I get this error:

checking for GTK - version >= 1.2.0... 
*** 'gtk-config --version' returned 1.2.8, but GTK+ (1.2.3)
*** was found! If gtk-config was correct, then it is best
*** to remove the old version of GTK+. You may also be able to fix the error
*** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing
*** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is
*** required on your system.
*** If gtk-config was wrong, set the environment variable GTK_CONFIG
*** to point to the correct copy of gtk-config, and remove the file
config.cache
*** before re-running configure
no
configure: error: *** GTK >= 1.2.0 not installed - please install first ***
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57990 (%build)

  I have searched the system (as root, using "find / -name gtk*") and I
cannot find the gtk+-1.2.3 reported to be found. The gtk-config --version
report (1.2.8) _is_ correct. There is no older version to be removed. I did
that quite some time ago.

  How do I find the source of this problem and fix it? This error crops up
frequently and prevents me from building apps using gtk+. I want to fix this
now, and I want to understand why I get this error message so I can prevent
it in the future.

Thanks,

Rich

Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President

                       Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. (TM)
              Making environmentally-responsible mining happen. (SM)         
                       --------------------------------
            2404 SW 22nd Street | Troutdale, OR 97060-1247 | U.S.A.
 + 1 503-667-4517 (voice) | + 1 503-667-8863 (fax) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to