Charles Galpin wrote: > mmh. your explanation make sense, but this box is a simple workstation > with 256MB of real RAM and 256MB of swap. It could conceivable be netscape > - I guess I'll keep an eye on memory usage.. > > thanks > I would be willing to bet that netscape is the culprit. I find that if I don't restart it occasionally it will indeed chew up everything possible but usually through active use I don't know about just sitting there. not to mention the cache/ tree eating up too much space in the user's home directory. I am thinking of trying the latest Mozilla milestone to see how it works but I need to find a mailer since I use communicator. Bret _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- status of ipchains regarding stateful firewalling Charles Galpin
- Re: status of ipchains regarding stateful fire... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: status of ipchains regarding stateful ... Charles Galpin
- RE: status of ipchains regarding state... Dan Browning
- Re: status of ipchains regarding stateful ... Thomas Ribbrock
- Re: status of ipchains regarding state... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: status of ipchains regarding stateful fire... Jeff Hogg
- kernel: VM: terminating process X Charles Galpin
- Re: kernel: VM: terminating process X Bret Hughes
- Re: kernel: VM: terminating proces... Charles Galpin
- kernel tar ball on RH 7 Bret Hughes
- kernel tar ball on RH 7 Hossein S. Zadeh
- Re: kernel tar ball on RH 7 Hal Burgiss
- Re: kernel tar ball on RH 7 Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: kernel tar ball on RH 7 Hossein S. Zadeh
- Re: kernel tar ball on RH... Hossein S. Zadeh
- Re: kernel tar ball on RH... Leonard den Ottolander